Dynamic Target Error Rate Adjustment for Wireless Power Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power control methods in wireless telecommunications networks, which use a fixed target frame error rate (FER), lead to inefficiencies due to mismatched stringency in radio frequency (RF) conditions, resulting in unnecessary high transmit power levels when conditions are good and inadequate compensation during poor conditions, causing frequent call drops.

Innovation Solution

Adjusting the target FER based on the signal strength of a pilot signal to dynamically control transmit power levels, allowing for more stringent or lenient power control depending on RF conditions, and re-evaluating the target FER as the mobile station moves to adapt to changing conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a fixed target FER is used for power control, then the power control process is simple to implement, but it causes unnecessary high transmit power levels when RF conditions are good and inadequate compensation when conditions are poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower control process complexityVSAvoidtransmit power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the target FER adjustable rather than fixed. The target FER is dynamically modified based on signal strength measurements and call drop detections, allowing the power control system to adapt its stringency to current RF conditions. This resolves the contradiction by enabling energy efficiency through dynamic adjustment while maintaining implementation simplicity through predefined adjustment rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the target FER parameter based on observed system performance. When call drops are detected or signal strength deteriorates, the target FER is increased (made less stringent), and when conditions improve, it is decreased (made more stringent). This parameter adaptation allows the system to optimize power consumption while maintaining call reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If a fixed target FER is used for power control, then the control algorithm remains simple, but it results in frequent call drops during poor RF conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol algorithm complexityVSAvoidcall connection stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by monitoring call drop events and signal strength measurements, then using this information to adjust the target FER. The system feeds back performance data (call drops, signal quality) to modify the power control target, creating a closed-loop system that improves reliability while maintaining algorithm simplicity through rule-based adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by proactively adjusting the target FER before call drops occur. When signal strength deteriorates or call drops are detected, the system preemptively increases the target FER to prevent further deterioration, rather than waiting for complete link failure. This anticipatory adjustment maintains reliability without requiring complex real-time intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If the target FER is adjusted dynamically based on signal strength, then power consumption is optimized, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmit power consumptionVSAvoidpower control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent manages complexity by implementing parameter changes through simple threshold-based rules rather than complex algorithms. The target FER is adjusted based on predefined signal strength thresholds and call drop detection rules, maintaining implementation simplicity while achieving dynamic optimization of power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies self-service by automatically adjusting the target FER based on its own performance measurements without requiring external intervention. The mobile station autonomously monitors signal strength and call drops, then self-adjusts the power control target to optimize power consumption, reducing the need for complex network-side control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS8126497B1Method and system for selecting target error rates for power-controlling wireless communication links
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 SPRINT SPECTRUM LLC
  • US8126497B1 patent drawing
  • US8126497B1 patent drawing
  • US8126497B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wireless communication link (a forward link or a reverse link) between a base station and a mobile station may be power-controlled to reduce a difference between an observed error rate in communications received over the link and a target error rate. The target error rate may be dependent upon the radio frequency (RF) conditions at the mobile station, which may be determined by measuring a signal strength of a pilot signal transmitted by the base station. Thus, a pilot signal strength at the mobile station may be determined, a target error rate may be selected based on the pilot signal strength, and the target error rate may be used to control a transmit power level of the wireless communication link. A mobile station may power-control a forward link and/or a base station may power-control a reverse link using a target error rate selected in this way.