Dynamic Task Assignment in Tiered Entity Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face inefficiencies in resource management, particularly in assigning tasks to entities with varying capabilities, leading to potential over- or under-use, which can increase resource usage and completion time.

Innovation Solution

A method for dynamic task assignment that determines the complexity of tasks and assigns them to appropriate entity tiers based on complexity thresholds and rules, ensuring optimal distribution across entities within a tier hierarchy, thereby reducing resource usage and completion time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If tasks are assigned to entities without considering complexity thresholds, then resource distribution may be simplified, but resource usage efficiency deteriorates due to over- or under-use of entities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource usage efficiencyVSAvoidassignment rule complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of task assignment by introducing complexity thresholds that determine which entities receive tasks. Tasks are evaluated against these threshold parameters, and only entities capable of handling tasks at or above the threshold level are assigned work, optimizing resource usage efficiency while maintaining manageable rule complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Entities self-manage their task assignments by evaluating their own capability levels against the complexity thresholds. Each entity can independently determine whether it should accept a task based on its own capabilities and the task's complexity level, eliminating the need for centralized micromanagement while improving resource distribution efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of time

If tasks are assigned without tier-based complexity evaluation, then assignment process is simpler, but task completion time increases due to mismatched entity-task pairing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion timeVSAvoidtier hierarchy complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments entities into multiple tiers based on their capability levels, with each tier capable of handling specific complexity ranges of tasks. This segmentation allows tasks to be quickly routed to the appropriate tier based on complexity evaluation, significantly reducing task completion time while maintaining a structured but manageable hierarchical framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Entities are pre-categorized into tiers based on their capabilities before task assignment occurs. This preliminary classification enables rapid task routing decisions without requiring real-time complex evaluations, reducing task completion time while establishing a clear hierarchical structure that guides assignment decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If complex rules are applied for task assignment, then resource distribution optimizes, but system adaptability decreases due to rigid rule structures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource distribution optimizationVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic task assignment where complexity thresholds and entity capabilities are continuously evaluated and adjusted. Rather than rigid fixed rules, the thresholds adapt based on changing system conditions, entity performance data, and task characteristics, maintaining resource distribution optimization while preserving system flexibility and adaptability to new scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240394109A1Dynamic task assignment
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 CENTRAL MUTUAL INSURANCE CO
  • US20240394109A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394109A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394109A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for dynamic task routing. One of the methods includes: determining, for a task to be performed by a system that includes two or more entity tiers in a tier hierarchy, each tier of which including a multiple entities that can work on tasks and for processing a different complexity of tasks, a complexity of the task; determining whether the complexity of the task satisfies a complexity threshold; and in response to determining that the complexity of the task does not satisfy the complexity threshold, assigning the task to a default tier in the tier hierarchy to enable all of the entities in the default tier to work on different portions of the task.