Dynamic Taxonomy Management for Database Search

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing database systems face challenges in effectively managing and developing taxonomies for emerging fields of technology and science, leading to inefficient communication and information retrieval due to the lack of specialized nomenclature and vocabulary.

Innovation Solution

A computer system with a flexible taxonomy management module that allows for the creation and certification of new terms through a network-based system, utilizing user input, expert panel assessment, and incentive programs to filter and integrate new terms into the taxonomy, enhancing query-based searching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a traditional database system is used without specialized taxonomy management, then the system structure remains simple, but the ability to manage and develop specialized taxonomies for emerging fields is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetaxonomy development capabilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments taxonomy management into distinct functional modules: a taxonomy development module for creating and certifying new terms, a search module for querying databases, and a certification module with expert panels for term validation. This segmentation allows specialized taxonomy functionality to be added without complicating the overall system architecture, as each module operates independently with defined interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The taxonomy management system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple subjects and emerging fields through a common architecture. The system provides multi-functional capabilities including term proposal, expert review, certification, and integration into search operations, allowing a single system to serve diverse taxonomy development needs across different scientific and technical domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If new terms are rapidly added to emerging fields, then the taxonomy becomes more comprehensive, but the accuracy and appropriateness of term usage may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetaxonomy development speedVSAvoidterm usage accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements preliminary action through automated term filtering and pre-certification processes. Before terms are added to the taxonomy, they undergo automated screening for format, completeness, and basic criteria compliance. This preliminary processing reduces the burden on expert panels and ensures that only pre-vetted terms proceed to expert review, thereby maintaining accuracy while accelerating the overall certification process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where expert panel decisions are recorded and used to refine automated filtering criteria. Certification outcomes, expert comments, and usage patterns feed back into the system to improve future term evaluation. This continuous feedback loop ensures that as the taxonomy grows, the accuracy and reliability of term selection are maintained and even improved over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If expert panels manually review all new terms, then term accuracy is maintained, but the time and resources required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterm assessment accuracyVSAvoidterm certification time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by having expert panels review only a subset of terms that pass automated filtering criteria. Rather than manually reviewing every proposed term, the automated system handles routine validation tasks, and expert panels focus their attention on complex or ambiguous cases. This partial expert involvement maintains high assessment accuracy while dramatically reducing the time and resources required compared to full manual review of all terms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

4Stability of the object's composition

If a rigid taxonomy structure is maintained, then consistency is preserved, but the ability to adapt to emerging terminology is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetaxonomy structure consistencyVSAvoidnew term integration capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The taxonomy structure is designed to be dynamic rather than rigid. The system allows for continuous addition, modification, and certification of new terms through automated and expert review processes. The taxonomy evolves over time as emerging terminology is identified, validated, and integrated, while maintaining structural consistency through standardized certification procedures. This dynamic approach enables the taxonomy to adapt to new scientific and technical developments while preserving organizational stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS8407203B2Computer system for enhanced taxonomy management
Publication Date: 2013.03.26 ELSEVIER INC
  • US8407203B2 patent drawing
  • US8407203B2 patent drawing
  • US8407203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer system and method are provided to promote the creation of a dynamically alterable taxonomy supporting query based database investigations is select fields. The system operates seamlessly and transparent to the underlying system search functions. A query that uses search terms unrecognized by the then extant taxonomy triggers a series of operations that test the new terms and updates the taxonomy as appropriate. To facilitate speed and accuracy, the system creates incentives to promote the enhancement of the taxonomy for an emerging technology.