Dynamic TDD Mechanism for Small Cell Network Interference

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In small cell network deployments, dynamic time division duplex (TDD) mechanisms face challenges such as near-far effects and inter-block interference due to timing misalignments among user equipment (UE) devices, leading to interference issues and inefficient resource utilization.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic TDD mechanism that coordinates scheduling to allocate different resource blocks for downlink (DL) and uplink (UL) traffic, delays UL transmission to mitigate timing misalignments, and supports a dynamic TDD frame structure allowing different UL/DL modes at base stations, ensuring orthogonality of OFDM symbols and reducing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If fixed TDD or FDD resource allocation schemes are applied in small cell deployments, then resource allocation is simplified, but multiple idle subframes occur and resource utilization efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation scheme complexityVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic TDD resource allocation where the base station can flexibly adjust UL/DL subframe configurations based on real-time traffic conditions. The DL/UL configuration is changed dynamically through signaling (e.g., DCI format 6/7) to match actual traffic demands, transforming the static fixed TDD/FDD scheme into an adaptive dynamic system that eliminates idle subframes and improves resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If dynamic TDD is implemented to improve resource utilization, then resource allocation efficiency improves, but timing misalignments among UE devices cause near-far effects and inter-block interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies timing advance adjustments as a preliminary action to compensate for timing misalignments before transmissions occur. The base station calculates and signals timing advance values to UE devices based on their distances and propagation delays, ensuring that UL transmissions from different UEs arrive synchronously at the base station, thereby preventing near-far effects and inter-block interference before they can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes transmission parameters including timing advance values, power levels, and resource block allocations to adapt to varying traffic conditions and mitigate interference. By adjusting these parameters in real-time based on channel conditions and traffic demands, the system maintains orthogonality and reduces interference while preserving dynamic resource allocation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic TDD with frequent UL/DL mode switching is implemented, then resource flexibility improves, but UE device complexity and power consumption increase due to tracking requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource flexibilityVSAvoidUE device tracking complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the base station proactively signals UL/DL configuration changes and timing advance adjustments to UE devices through downlink control information. Instead of requiring UEs to continuously track and determine configurations autonomously, the base station provides the necessary configuration information directly, reducing UE device complexity and power consumption while maintaining resource flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Object-affected harmful factors

If UL transmission is delayed to mitigate timing misalignments, then interference is reduced, but transmission latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterference reductionVSAvoidtransmission latency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the timing advance parameter based on real-time traffic conditions and channel state information. Rather than applying fixed delays, the system optimizes timing advance values to achieve just enough synchronization to prevent interference while minimizing unnecessary latency. This parameter optimization allows the system to balance interference reduction with transmission latency requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9980279B2Dynamic time division duplex mechanism for small cell network
Publication Date: 2018.05.22 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US9980279B2 patent drawing
  • US9980279B2 patent drawing
  • US9980279B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dynamic time division duplex (TDD) mechanism for small cellular networks is disclosed. The mechanism dynamically allocates radio resource usage with commensurate increases in throughput and reductions in latency. For example, scheduling data comprising scheduling information data can be received by a device, wherein the scheduling information data comprises uplink allocation data. Then the device can switch from a first mode to a second mode as a function of the uplink allocation data, and transmission data can be transmitted in a subframe of a frame by skipping a resource allocated for the scheduling information data.