Dynamic Team Formation in Group Assessment Processing
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing systems lack efficiency in inputting, processing, and displaying data related to alternative assessment data, particularly in generating group consensus and multi-criteria decisions, and fail to effectively synthesize diverse parameters affecting a primary decision.
Innovation Solution
The Definitive Pro System (DPS) provides a graphical user interface for collaborative, consistent, and transparent processing of consensus data, utilizing dynamic team formation and multi-tier data transfer to efficiently input, process, and display assessment data, including the analytic hierarchy process, to synthesize diverse parameters and conserve computer resources.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of information
If detailed assessment processing data is displayed comprehensively, then information completeness is improved, but computer resource consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments assessment data into hierarchical levels (first level parameters, second level parameters, third level parameters) and displays them in structured groups. This segmentation allows comprehensive information presentation while optimizing resource usage by processing and displaying data in organized, manageable units rather than as a single large dataset.
2Loss of information
If comprehensive assessment data is processed and transferred, then data completeness is improved, but data transfer requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system divides assessment data into hierarchical segments (first level, second level, third level parameters) that can be processed and transferred in structured units. This segmentation enables complete data representation while reducing overall transfer requirements through efficient organization and localized processing of data subsets.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent organizes assessment data across multiple hierarchical dimensions (levels of parameters), transforming the data structure from a flat comprehensive set into a multi-dimensional hierarchical framework. This dimensional reorganization allows complete information retention while enabling more efficient data transfer through selective processing of hierarchical subsets.
3Measurement precision
If complex parameter synthesis is performed, then decision accuracy is improved, but processing complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the complex parameter synthesis process into hierarchical levels where first level parameters are synthesized from second level parameters, which in turn are synthesized from third level parameters. This segmentation reduces processing complexity by breaking down the overall synthesis task into manageable hierarchical steps while maintaining decision accuracy through systematic aggregation.
Solution Approach 2:
The system performs preliminary synthesis of lower-level parameters (second and third level) before finalizing higher-level decisions. This preliminary action organizes and pre-processes data in a hierarchical sequence, reducing the complexity of final synthesis operations while ensuring accurate decision outcomes through systematic preparation of input data.
Data Source
AI summary
An apparatus is provided to interface with users to perform group assessment processing and display of results in conjunction with selection of items. The apparatus may comprise a communication portion that provides communication between the computer processor and electronic user devices; a database; and a computer processor performing processing including: (A) storing an assessment architecture; (B) interfacing with a facilitator user to input team formation data for the assessment architecture, the team formation data dictating selection of a plurality of candidate participants for the assessment architecture; (C) generating a respective communication for each of the plurality of candidate participants to invite each candidate participant to participate in the assessment architecture; (D) sending the respective communication to each of the plurality of candidate participants; and (E) engaging with each of the plurality of candidate participants over an electronic network to populate the assessment architecture.