Dynamic Test Image Cycle Control for Printer Maintenance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Arbitrary setting of the test image cycle in image forming apparatuses can lead to delayed error detection and reduced productivity, resulting in increased paper waste.

Innovation Solution

An image forming apparatus that sets the test image cycle based on updated history information, including the number of recording media and maintenance conditions, to optimize the timing and frequency of test image formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If test image formation frequency is increased, then error detection timing is improved, but productivity is reduced and paper waste increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection timingVSAvoidnormal image formation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The test image formation cycle is changed from a fixed arbitrary setting to a dynamic value that automatically adjusts based on the actual condition of the image forming unit. The control unit determines the test cycle based on operational data and maintenance history, making the system adaptive rather than static. This resolves the contradiction by allowing frequent testing when needed (improving reliability) while reducing unnecessary testing during normal operation (maintaining productivity).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the control unit continuously monitors the condition of the image forming unit and adjusts the test image formation cycle accordingly. Maintenance information and operational data are fed back into the control unit to dynamically determine when testing should occur. This feedback loop ensures testing happens at optimal intervals - frequent enough to detect errors early but not so frequent as to hinder productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If test image formation frequency is increased, then error detection timing is improved, but paper waste due to test images increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection timingVSAvoidpaper waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The test cycle dynamically adapts based on actual device conditions rather than following a fixed schedule. When the image forming unit is operating normally, the test cycle extends, reducing the number of test images formed and thereby reducing paper waste. When degradation signs are detected, the cycle shortens to prioritize error detection. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction between early error detection and paper conservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of test image formation timing based on monitored conditions such as operational hours, maintenance history, and performance metrics. By adjusting this temporal parameter dynamically, the system forms test images only when necessary for detection purposes, minimizing paper consumption while maintaining adequate error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If user arbitrarily sets test image cycle, then flexibility is improved, but error detection timing becomes delayed or productivity reduces depending on settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecycle setting flexibilityVSAvoiderror detection timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from requiring user configuration to self-determining the optimal test cycle. The control unit automatically analyzes operational data, maintenance history, and device conditions to set the test image formation cycle without user intervention. This self-service approach eliminates the reliability issues caused by arbitrary user settings while maintaining adaptability through automated decision-making based on actual device state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from operational monitoring and maintenance data to automatically determine the appropriate test cycle. Rather than relying on user guesses or arbitrary settings, the control unit continuously receives feedback about device condition and adjusts the test frequency accordingly. This ensures optimal error detection timing adapts to actual usage patterns and device health without requiring user expertise or manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3088198B1Image-forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2021.04.14 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • EP3088198B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3088198B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3088198B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The image-forming apparatus is provided with: an image-forming unit (30) for forming an image on a print medium (P); a second storage unit (90) for storing historical information relating to maintenance of the image-forming unit (30); and a control unit (120) for setting, when the historical information stored in the second storage unit (90) is updated, a test image-forming period for forming a test image to be used in adjusting the image-forming unit (30) on the basis of the updated historical information. As a result, the period for forming the test image is appropriately set.