Dynamic Threat Modeling for Scalable Software Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current threat modeling approaches are static, ineffective, and unable to scale with complex software application ecosystems, failing to provide real-time risk analytics and manage dynamic application architectures.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically generates interactive and predictive threat models using automated data aggregation, machine-learning techniques, and visualization to identify and mitigate security threats in real-time, with modules for data flow simulation, anomaly detection, and security control visualization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional static threat modeling approaches are used, then implementation simplicity is maintained, but the system cannot scale to hundreds or thousands of software applications and cannot keep pace with rapid changes in the software landscape

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to scale to hundreds or thousands of applicationsVSAvoidcomplexity of threat modeling system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms static threat modeling into a dynamic system that automatically updates as software applications change. The system continuously monitors application architecture, code, and infrastructure, and automatically regenerates threat models without manual intervention, enabling it to scale across hundreds or thousands of applications while adapting to rapid changes in the software landscape

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The threat modeling system performs self-service by automatically discovering software applications, extracting architecture information, identifying security threats, and generating threat models without requiring manual input from security analysts. This automation enables the system to scale to large numbers of applications while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If manual input and antiquated approaches are used for threat modeling, then system complexity is reduced, but effectiveness and efficiency deteriorate and cannot keep pace with rapid changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of threat modelingVSAvoidautomation infrastructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical processes with automated computational systems. Instead of security analysts manually reviewing application architecture and identifying threats, the system uses automated data aggregation from multiple sources, machine learning algorithms for threat detection, and computational models for risk analysis, significantly improving effectiveness while managing complexity through automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where threat models are automatically generated, validated against current application state, and updated as new information becomes available. This feedback mechanism ensures threat modeling effectiveness keeps pace with rapid changes in the software landscape by continuously adapting to new threats and architecture modifications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If point-in-time state representation is used, then data processing complexity is minimized, but the system cannot provide real-time or near real-time risk analytics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of threat detection and risk analyticsVSAvoiddata aggregation and transformation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous data aggregation and processing instead of periodic snapshots. The system continuously collects data from application architecture, code repositories, and infrastructure sources, maintaining an up-to-date representation of the software landscape that enables real-time or near real-time risk analytics while managing data complexity through streamlined aggregation pipelines

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Reliability

If comprehensive security analysis across large application ecosystems is performed, then security coverage is improved, but the analysis becomes tedious and unmanageable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity analysis coverageVSAvoidmanageability of security analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the large application ecosystem into individual application components and their associated threat models. Each application is analyzed independently, and results are aggregated into a comprehensive view. This segmentation makes the analysis manageable by breaking down complex ecosystems into smaller, tractable units while maintaining comprehensive security coverage across all applications

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10503907B2Intelligent threat modeling and visualization
Publication Date: 2019.12.10 FMR CORP
  • US10503907B2 patent drawing
  • US10503907B2 patent drawing
  • US10503907B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system is provided for visualizing and analyzing security threats in a suite of software applications. The system includes a visualization module for rendering, on a computer display, a map with components representative of the suite of software applications and relationships among the software applications. The components are displayed in a base layer of the map. The system also includes a threat modeling module configured to automatically identify one or more security threats in the suite of software applications. The threat modeling module is adapted to interact with the visualization module to graphically depict on the computer display the one or more security threats on the map in a threat modeling layer. The system further includes a security controls module configured to implement security controls for mitigating the one or more security threats identified by the threat modeling module.