Dynamic Ticket Pricing System for Event Revenue Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for pricing and managing event tickets, such as those for sports and concerts, face challenges in accurately forecasting demand and optimizing prices, especially for 'one-off' events, due to factors like variable customer preferences and changing market conditions, leading to suboptimal revenue generation and inefficient inventory management.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method that analyzes external data, including web traffic, demographics, and secondary market data, to dynamically adjust ticket prices and redirect inventory, using mathematical models to predict demand and optimize revenue, while also correlating customer demographics with ticket preferences for targeted marketing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If dynamic pricing models are implemented to optimize revenue, then revenue generation is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverevenue generationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts pricing parameters based on demand forecasts, event proximity, and market conditions. The pricing model transforms static face values into flexible price points that adapt to real-time data, optimizing revenue while managing complexity through algorithmic automation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously monitor sales data, demand indicators, and market conditions. This feedback mechanism enables the pricing system to learn from past performance and adjust future pricing decisions, improving revenue optimization while maintaining system manageability through automated control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If manual pricing decisions are made by promoters and venue representatives, then ease of operation is maintained, but pricing accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpricing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service pricing decisions by automatically analyzing demand data, forecasting ticket sales, and generating optimized price recommendations. This eliminates the need for manual intervention in pricing calculations while maintaining operational simplicity through automated decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical pricing decisions with automated computational models that process large datasets to determine optimal prices. This substitution improves pricing accuracy through data-driven analysis while maintaining ease of operation through automated execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If section-based pricing is used to simplify venue pricing, then ease of operation is improved, but pricing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpricing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the venue into multiple pricing zones based on view quality, accessibility, and demand patterns. This segmentation enables precise pricing for different seat categories while maintaining operational simplicity through automated zone assignment and price application

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality pricing by assigning different price points to specific venue locations based on their unique characteristics. Each zone or seat category receives customized pricing that reflects its specific value proposition, improving precision while maintaining ease of operation through automated localization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If real-time demand analysis is performed to optimize ticket allocation, then productivity is improved, but computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveticket allocation efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial demand analysis by focusing computational resources on the most critical pricing zones and time periods. Rather than analyzing every possible scenario, the system identifies and processes only the most impactful demand signals, improving ticket allocation efficiency while reducing computational resource consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10963818B2Sports and concert event ticket pricing and visualization system
Publication Date: 2021.03.30 TIXTRACK
  • US10963818B2 patent drawing
  • US10963818B2 patent drawing
  • US10963818B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for displaying seat inventory at a venue and facilitating planning of ticket prices for events at the venue is presented. Methods to predict total revenue for an event are described. Also presented are systems and methods for determining at what price and when to release so-called ‘flex’ price tickets during an on-sale using the sales velocity and sales/inquiry ratios. Determining demand of seats from secondary markets is also described with methods to use the demand for either re-pricing the seats in the primary market or presenting ‘best value’ seats to a prospective purchaser. Outputted tickets can be used to initiate entry processes to a gate structure of a venue by unlocking the gate structure or denying access through the gate structure of an invalid outputted ticket.