Dynamic Time-Limit Privacy Protection for Monitoring Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional image processing techniques for monitoring cameras lack flexibility and convenience in applying privacy protection measures, as they do not allow for dynamic adjustment of privacy protection settings based on individual time limits.

Innovation Solution

An image processing apparatus that includes an obtainment unit, recognition unit, setting unit, and processing unit to detect and apply privacy protection to images of individuals based on pre-set time limits, using methods such as silhouette conversion, binarization, or mask processing, allowing for flexible and convenient privacy protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional privacy protection techniques are used without time limit settings, then privacy protection can be applied to all detected persons, but it lacks flexibility and convenience in applying processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of privacy protection applicationVSAvoidconvenience of privacy protection processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic time limit settings for privacy protection processing. The setting unit allows configuration of specific time limits for each person, and the processing unit automatically determines whether to apply privacy protection based on whether the current time exceeds the set time limit. This dynamic approach enables flexible adaptation to different privacy protection needs while maintaining operational convenience through automated time-based decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of time limit configuration to control privacy protection processing. By allowing different time limit parameters to be set for different persons, the system achieves flexible privacy protection application. The processing unit compares the current time with the stored time limit parameter to automatically determine whether to apply anonymization processing, thus resolving the contradiction between flexibility and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If privacy protection processing is applied to all persons in monitoring images, then personal information is protected, but administrative costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection effectivenessVSAvoidadministrative cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic privacy protection based on time limit configurations. The processing unit automatically determines whether to apply privacy protection processing by comparing current time with the time limit set for each person. This dynamic approach ensures privacy protection is applied only when necessary (when time limit is exceeded), maintaining protection effectiveness while reducing unnecessary processing and associated administrative costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses time limit parameters to control the application of privacy protection processing. By configuring specific time limits for different persons and automatically comparing current time with these parameters, the system achieves cost-effective privacy protection. This parameter-based control eliminates the need for manual review of all images, reducing administrative costs while maintaining reliable privacy protection when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual review of all monitoring images is performed to determine privacy protection targets, then accurate privacy protection can be applied, but time consumption and administrative burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of privacy protection target identificationVSAvoidtime for privacy protection management
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring time limit parameters for each person before monitoring begins. The setting unit stores these time limit parameters in advance, and the processing unit automatically retrieves and compares these pre-set parameters with current time to determine privacy protection application. This eliminates the need for manual review while maintaining accurate identification of privacy protection targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables the system to automatically determine and apply privacy protection processing without manual intervention. The processing unit self-service by automatically comparing current time with stored time limit parameters and applying anonymization processing when the time limit is exceeded. This automated self-service approach maintains accurate target identification while eliminating time-consuming manual review processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10750053B2Image processing apparatus, method of controlling image processing apparatus, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2020.08.18 CANON KK
  • US10750053B2 patent drawing
  • US10750053B2 patent drawing
  • US10750053B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image processing apparatus, comprising: an obtainment unit configured to obtain an image captured by an image capturing apparatus; a recognition unit configured to recognize a person from the image obtained by the obtainment unit; a setting unit configured to set a time limit for the person to be recognized by the recognition unit; and a processing unit configured to execute processing for privacy protection on an image including the person for which the time limit set by the setting unit has been exceeded.