Dynamic Traffic Light Control for Vulnerable Road User Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current traffic management systems do not effectively prioritize vulnerable road users (VRUs) while maintaining smooth traffic flow, leading to potential accidents and dissatisfaction among both VRUs and vehicle users.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic infrastructure-based monitoring system using multi-modal sensors like cameras, LiDAR, and radio proximity estimation to predict VRU behavior and intent, optimizing traffic light phases to adapt priority and reduce congestion and accidents.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traffic lights are optimized for vehicle traffic flow, then traffic flow efficiency is improved, but safety of vulnerable road users deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic flow efficiencyVSAvoidsafety of vulnerable road users
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The traffic light system dynamically adjusts signal phases based on real-time detection of vulnerable road users. The controller monitors sensor data (cameras, LiDAR, radio proximity) and adaptively changes traffic light states to prioritize VRU safety when detected, while maintaining efficient vehicle flow when VRUs are absent. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the system responsive to actual conditions rather than fixed optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensors detect VRU presence and behavior, the controller processes this information to determine intent, and traffic light phases are adjusted accordingly. This feedback mechanism ensures that safety considerations are continuously integrated into traffic flow management, resolving the contradiction between efficiency and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traffic lights provide priority to VRUs, then safety of vulnerable road users is improved, but traffic flow smoothness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of vulnerable road usersVSAvoidtraffic flow smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides VRU priority only when and where needed, based on dynamic detection of VRU presence, intent, and crossing probability. When no VRUs are detected or their crossing intent is low, the system reverts to normal vehicle-optimized timing, thus maintaining traffic flow smoothness. This conditional, dynamic priority assignment resolves the contradiction between safety improvement and flow maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different control strategies to different traffic light phases and intersections based on local VRU detection. Rather than uniformly prioritizing VRUs across all times and locations, the system locally adapts priority assignment to specific VRU situations, minimizing impact on overall traffic flow while maximizing safety where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If multi-modal sensors are deployed to predict VRU behavior, then detection precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveVRU behavior detection precisionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex sensing task across multiple specialized sensors (cameras for visual behavior, LiDAR for depth and motion, radio proximity for near-field detection). Each sensor type handles specific aspects of VRU detection, and the controller integrates these segmented data streams. This segmentation achieves high detection precision while managing complexity through modular sensor architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller serves multiple functions: it processes data from various sensor types, predicts VRU behavior and intent, determines crossing probability, and controls traffic light phases. This multi-functional controller consolidates complexity into a single processing unit that handles all sensing and control tasks, reducing overall system complexity despite using multiple sensor modalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240233526A1Dynamic control of infrastructure for vulnerable users
Publication Date: 2024.07.11 INTEL CORP
  • US20240233526A1 patent drawing
  • US20240233526A1 patent drawing
  • US20240233526A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for dynamically controlling an infrastructure item are disclosed. The systems and methods may include receiving environmental data. The environmental data may capture behavior of a crossing user. An intent of the crossing user may be determined based on the environmental data. A setting of the infrastructure item may be changed based on the intent of the crossing user.