Dynamic Transaction Intervention for Self-Service Security

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-service retail environments face reduced security and inefficiency due to the lack of control over user-directed transactions, leading to compromised security and management challenges.

Innovation Solution

A method that dynamically adjusts interventions by collecting user data during transactions to determine a preferred level of intervention, using sensors and user-defined preferences to selectively provide or remove interactions, such as promotional offers or additional steps, to control the transaction flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If self-service retail environments operate autonomously with minimal oversight, then ease of operation and productivity are improved, but security control and system management capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables autonomous transaction processing where users complete purchases without employee assistance, while the system automatically monitors and manages the transaction flow, maintaining security control through automated oversight rather than human supervision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects user data during transactions and uses this feedback to dynamically adjust intervention levels, allowing the system to maintain security control while adapting to individual user needs and transaction contexts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If self-service systems reduce friction and automate item identification, then productivity and ease of operation are improved, but security control and load management capacity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of intervention and security measures based on real-time user data and transaction context, rather than applying fixed security protocols to all users, allowing productivity to increase while maintaining adaptive security control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters such as intervention level, monitoring intensity, and security measures based on collected user data, enabling the system to maintain security control while optimizing productivity for different user scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If autonomous self-checkout systems are implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but system load management and user flow control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsystem load management
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system adjusts operational parameters such as intervention frequency, monitoring intensity, and resource allocation based on system load and user flow conditions, enabling automatic load management while maintaining ease of operation for users

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240046274A1Dynamically-tunable interventions for user transactions
Publication Date: 2024.02.08 TOSHIBA GLOBAL COMMERCE SOLUTIONS HLDG
  • US20240046274A1 patent drawing
  • US20240046274A1 patent drawing
  • US20240046274A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides techniques to selectively provide user interventions. A transaction is initiated for a user device, and data describing a user of the user device during the transaction is collected. A preferred level of intervention for the transaction is determined based on the collected data. Interventions are selectively provided to the user device during the transaction based on the preferred level of intervention.