Dynamic Two-Step Random Access Selection for Non-Terrestrial Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Non-terrestrial wireless communication networks face challenges in supporting high reliability and low latency random access operations due to large propagation delays and varying conditions, such as high mobility of base stations and large round-trip delays, which affect the efficiency of random access procedures.

Innovation Solution

A communication device, such as a UE, is configured to select between a two-step and a four-step random access procedure based on various criteria, including reference signal received power, round-trip delay, and other network conditions, to optimize resource allocation and reduce latency, using specific bandwidth parts configured for multiple random access procedures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a four-step random access procedure is used in non-terrestrial networks, then reliability is improved, but latency increases due to large propagation delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access reliabilityVSAvoidrandom access latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic selection between two-step and four-step random access procedures based on real-time network conditions, propagation delay measurements, and UE capabilities. The network can adaptively configure and switch between different RACH procedures to optimize both reliability and latency performance under varying non-terrestrial network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes key parameters including the number of message exchanges (2 vs 4 steps), timing advance values, and resource allocation configurations to adapt to different propagation delay conditions. By adjusting these parameters dynamically, the system achieves improved reliability without excessive latency penalty.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If a two-step random access procedure is used to reduce latency, then latency is reduced, but reliability deteriorates under varying network conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access latencyVSAvoidrandom access reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects between two-step and four-step procedures based on current network conditions, ensuring low latency when possible while maintaining reliability through fallback to four-step when conditions deteriorate. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by making the procedure selection context-dependent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the network monitors random access success rates, propagation delay variations, and UE responses to determine whether to maintain two-step procedure or switch to four-step procedure. This feedback loop ensures reliability is maintained while minimizing latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple random access procedures are configured in a bandwidth part, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverandom access procedure adaptabilityVSAvoidUE configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent configures a single bandwidth part to support multiple random access procedures (both two-step and four-step), making the BWP universal and multi-functional. This approach improves adaptability while controlling complexity by avoiding the need for separate BWP configurations for each procedure type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different random access procedure configurations within specific resource regions of the BWP, allowing localized optimization for different procedure types while maintaining overall BWP coherence. This local differentiation enables adaptability without requiring complete BWP reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11737146B2Resource selection associated with two-step random access procedures
Publication Date: 2023.08.22 QUALCOMM INC
  • US11737146B2 patent drawing
  • US11737146B2 patent drawing
  • US11737146B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices for wireless communication are described. A communication device, such as a user equipment (UE) may identify information for transmitting to a base station of a non-terrestrial network. The UE may identify that one or more resources allocated for transmitting the information are available based at least in part on identifying the information. The one or more resources include one or more types of uplink resources including physical random access channel (PRACH) resources or physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) resources for the random access procedure, a PUSCH for a scheduling request (SR), or a physical uplink control channel (PUCCH) for a configured grant, or a combination thereof. As a result, the UE may transmit, to the base station, a message over the one or more resources allocated for the information based at least in part on identifying the one or more resources.