Dynamic TXOP Adjustment for Wireless Channel Contention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In wireless communication networks, especially multiple access networks, the existing CSMA/CA and EDCA methods fail to efficiently manage transmission opportunities (TXOP) due to default, hardwired values, leading to inefficiencies and unfair access when devices have varying transmission priorities and encounter interference from external sources.

Innovation Solution

A method where network devices dynamically adjust their maximum allowable transmission time parameters based on successful and unsuccessful transmission attempts, monitoring contention levels to adapt TXOP values, ensuring fair access and efficient channel utilization by reducing TXOP during high contention and increasing it during low contention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If default hardwired TXOP values are used in CSMA/CA and EDCA methods, then consistent access control is maintained, but channel utilization efficiency deteriorates due to inability to adapt to varying network contention levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel utilization efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to network contention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of TXOP values by monitoring network contention levels and adapting the maximum transmission time parameter accordingly. The system transitions from static hardwired values to dynamic values that adjust based on real-time channel conditions, resolving the contradiction between consistency and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a feedback mechanism where the system monitors transmission success rates and channel contention levels, then uses this information to adjust TXOP values. This closed-loop control enables the system to adapt to varying network conditions while maintaining efficient channel utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If higher priority devices wait smaller idle time in EDCA, then transmission priority is improved, but fair access deteriorates as low priority devices experience prolonged waiting periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission priority responseVSAvoidfair access to channel
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the TXOP values for different priority levels based on monitored network contention. When contention is high, the system modifies waiting times and transmission opportunities to ensure fairer access across all devices, while maintaining priority differentiation. This resolves the contradiction by making priority mechanisms adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If a device owns the channel for extended transmission, then transmission efficiency is improved, but interference to other devices worsens during high contention periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidinterference to other devices
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adjustment of TXOP duration based on real-time monitoring of network contention levels. When contention is detected to be high, the system automatically reduces maximum transmission time to minimize interference to other devices. When contention is low, TXOP is increased to maximize transmission efficiency. This resolves the contradiction by making transmission duration adaptive to network conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the TXOP parameter dynamically based on monitored transmission success rates and channel contention. The system adjusts this critical parameter to balance transmission efficiency with interference reduction, resolving the contradiction between these two opposing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If slow transmitters gain channel access, then transmission opportunity is improved, but overall network throughput deteriorates as faster devices are blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel access opportunityVSAvoidnetwork throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts TXOP values based on monitored transmission performance and network contention. The system identifies slow transmitters through monitoring and adjusts their TXOP allocations to prevent them from monopolizing the channel, thereby maintaining network throughput while still providing fair access opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9445407B2Dynamic setting of transmission time in a contention based wireless system
Publication Date: 2016.09.13 BRITISH TELECOM PLC
  • US9445407B2 patent drawing
  • US9445407B2 patent drawing
  • US9445407B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a wireless communications network, access points and connected mobile devices transmit data via a radio frequency spectrum channel. When a device has packets for transmission it must check the channel is available before it can transmit the data. Furthermore there is a Transmission Opportunity (TXOP) parameter which limits the maximum amount of time that a device can transmit packets before it must relinquish the channel so that other devices are not locked out. Each device in the network is capable of updating its own TXOP parameters in order to respond to changes in the level of interference and contention in the surrounding area. In this way devices can transmit for longer periods of time when contention is low, while responding to increased network contention by shortening the TXOP to ensure fair access for all other devices in the network.