Dynamic UX Application Workflows for Personalized Rapid Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing applications lack agility, personalization, and integration, leading to slow delivery and inconsistent user experiences due to tight coupling of business logic and lack of standardization, making it difficult to adapt to market demands and integrate multiple systems within organizations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for generating dynamic user experience applications that decouple business information and UX, allowing for agile, personalized, and quickly delivered applications by creating workflows and steps that can be modified and executed on client devices without redeployment, using a path management application to manage canonical resources and user interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If business logic is contained in presentation and service layers with tight coupling, then application structure is unified and manageable, but changes to business logic require extensive testing and multiple component modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication structureVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments business logic into independent, reusable components that can be modified without affecting the entire application. By decoupling business logic from presentation layers and organizing it into discrete units, the system allows targeted changes and testing of specific components rather than requiring full application regression testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts business logic from tightly coupled presentation and service layers, placing it in a separate, independently manageable structure. This extraction allows business logic to be developed, tested, and deployed separately from the user interface components, reducing the testing burden when business rules change.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of manufacture

If the same user interfaces are provided to every user, then application development is simplified and consistent, but personalized user experiences cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication developmentVSAvoiduser personalization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic user interfaces that can adapt to individual user needs while maintaining a standardized base structure. The system allows configuration of UI elements based on user profiles, preferences, and contextual information, enabling personalization without requiring separate development for each user scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by allowing specific portions of the user interface to be customized for individual users while keeping the overall application structure consistent. This enables personalization of specific UI elements (such as displayed information, controls, or workflows) without affecting the entire application or other users' experiences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If simple modifications are made to application code, then specific functionality can be improved, but cascading changes occur across multiple applications requiring extensive testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodification speedVSAvoidapplication stability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the application into modular components with well-defined interfaces, allowing modifications to be isolated to specific segments. This segmentation prevents cascading changes by ensuring that changes in one module do not propagate unexpectedly to other modules, thereby maintaining application stability while enabling rapid development.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates universal, reusable components that can be used across multiple applications. By designing components with standardized interfaces and behaviors, a single modification to a universal component can be safely applied across multiple applications without requiring individual testing of each usage context, improving both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple systems and applications are integrated within an organization, then functionality is enhanced and systems work together, but integration becomes difficult due to inconsistent APIs and data schemas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidintegration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes universal standards for APIs and data schemas that enable multiple systems and applications to integrate seamlessly. By defining consistent interfaces and data formats that can be used across different applications and systems, the patent reduces integration complexity while maintaining the ability to enhance functionality through system interoperability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20260012521A1Method and system for generating dynamic user experience applications
Publication Date: 2026.01.08 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20260012521A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012521A1 patent drawing
  • US20260012521A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods may be provided for generating applications that may be agile, personalized, quickly delivered, and capable of being seamlessly integrated across an organization. The behavior and functionality of the applications (e.g., user interfaces therein) may be tailored specifically to individual users in response to learned user preferences. Consequently, these dynamic user experience (UX) applications may be rapidly deployed and capable of providing a satisfactory yet complete user experience across one or more applications. The methods and systems may include receiving a user objective, selecting a path associated with one or more steps, generating a dynamic UX application based on the steps, transmitting the dynamic UX application to the user, and displaying the dynamic UX application.