Dynamic Vehicle Parameter Estimation for Powertrain Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems face challenges in dynamically determining vehicle parameters such as power loss due to aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, and powertrain losses, due to complexity, computational burden, and reliability issues.

Innovation Solution

A method involving an electronic control system that estimates coefficients of a vehicle loss model, evaluates convergence criteria, sets converged values, determines vehicle powertrain commands, and transmits these commands to control powertrain components, using a combination of sensors, actuators, and predictive models to optimize powertrain operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If dynamic determination of vehicle parameters is implemented, then powertrain performance is improved, but computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepowertrain performanceVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle loss model is segmented into multiple coefficients (aero drag coefficient, rolling resistance coefficient, powertrain loss coefficient) that are estimated independently through iterative optimization. This segmentation allows the complex dynamic determination problem to be broken down into manageable sub-problems, reducing computational burden while maintaining accuracy in powertrain performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary estimation of vehicle parameters using sensor data before final powertrain control decisions are made. By pre-estimating coefficients such as aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance using available sensor measurements and iterative optimization, the system reduces the computational load during real-time control while ensuring accurate powertrain performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If dynamic determination of vehicle parameters is implemented, then control accuracy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms where sensor measurements (vehicle speed, acceleration, engine parameters) are continuously fed into the vehicle loss model, and the estimated coefficients are used to adjust powertrain control in real-time. This feedback loop ensures high control accuracy by adapting to actual vehicle conditions while managing system complexity through structured estimation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle control system performs self-characterization by autonomously estimating its own loss coefficients (aerodynamic drag, rolling resistance, powertrain losses) using onboard sensor data and iterative optimization algorithms. This self-service capability eliminates the need for external calibration equipment or complex manual testing, improving control accuracy while keeping the system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If iterative coefficient estimation is used, then parameter accuracy is improved, but computation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter accuracyVSAvoidcomputation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The iterative coefficient estimation is performed periodically at predetermined intervals rather than continuously, balancing parameter accuracy with computation time. The system estimates vehicle loss coefficients at specific time points or under certain conditions, allowing sufficient time for accurate iterative optimization while avoiding excessive computational burden from continuous real-time estimation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary estimation of vehicle parameters using available sensor data before final powertrain control decisions are made. By pre-estimating coefficients such as aerodynamic drag and rolling resistance using available sensor measurements and iterative optimization, the system reduces the computational load during real-time control while ensuring accurate powertrain performance optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10000214B2Vehicle controls including dynamic vehicle parameter determination
Publication Date: 2018.06.19 CUMMINS INC
  • US10000214B2 patent drawing
  • US10000214B2 patent drawing
  • US10000214B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatuses, methods, systems and controls including dynamic vehicle parameter determination are disclosed. One embodiment is a method of operating a vehicle system including a powertrain comprising a prime mover structured to propel the vehicle, and an electronic control system in operative communication with the prime mover and the transmission. The method includes estimating a plurality of coefficients of a vehicle loss model, evaluating a convergence criterion for the plurality of estimated coefficients, setting converged values of the plurality of coefficients if the convergence criterion is satisfied, determining a vehicle powertrain command utilizing the converged values of the plurality of coefficients, and transmitting a vehicle powertrain command to control operation of one or more powertrain components.