Dynamic Via Pillar Selection for Electromigration Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electromigration (EM) in integrated circuits causes metal atom transport and potential open-circuit failures due to increasing current densities, leading to inefficient resource allocation and poor Power Performance Area (PPA) results when attempting to prevent EM through over-design.

Innovation Solution

The method involves swapping a minimum EM via pillar with an appropriate via pillar based on toggle rate and loading capacitance to alleviate EM phenomena, optimizing routing resources and improving PPA without increasing pin density, by using EM checking and optimization processes during the integrated circuit fabrication flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If over-design cell by putting much BEOL resource for cell EM signoff, then EM violations are prevented, but routing resources are wasted and PPA results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEM violation preventionVSAvoidPPA result
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of via pillar configuration from a fixed over-designed approach to a dynamic selection based on actual toggle rate and loading capacitance. By calculating EM risk for different via pillar types and selecting the minimum sufficient configuration, the patent prevents EM violations while avoiding excessive resource allocation, thus improving PPA results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of applying excessive EM prevention measures uniformly to all cells, the patent applies partial action by selectively optimizing via pillar configuration only for cells where EM risk is actually present. The patent calculates EM risk for each cell and applies the minimum necessary via pillar enhancement, avoiding unnecessary resource consumption in cells with low EM risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If increase via pillar size to prevent EM, then EM resistance is improved, but routing resources are consumed and pin density increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEM resistanceVSAvoidrouting resource
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the via pillar configuration parameter based on calculated EM risk, toggle rate, and loading capacitance. By selecting from multiple via pillar types (e.g., 1x1, 2x1, 2x2) rather than uniformly using the largest size, the patent achieves adequate EM resistance while minimizing routing resource consumption and pin density increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies via pillar enhancement partially - only to the extent necessary for each cell's actual EM risk. By calculating the minimum sufficient via pillar configuration for each cell based on its specific electrical characteristics, the patent avoids excessive via pillar sizing that would waste routing resources and increase pin density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If use minimum EM via pillar, then routing resources are conserved, but EM violations may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting resource efficiencyVSAvoidEM violation prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces feedback by calculating EM risk for each cell based on its actual toggle rate and loading capacitance, then using this feedback to select the appropriate via pillar configuration. This closed-loop approach ensures that the minimum sufficient via pillar is selected for each cell, preventing EM violations while optimizing routing resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes the via pillar configuration parameter based on calculated EM risk. By adjusting the via pillar size and type according to each cell's specific electrical characteristics rather than using a fixed minimum or maximum size, the patent achieves both EM violation prevention and routing resource efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces EM violations while conserving routing resources, enhancing the Power Performance Area (PPA) results by selecting the optimal via pillar configuration based on actual routing conditions and toggle rates.

Implementation Method 1

Electromigration (EM) is the transport of metal atoms when an electric current flows through a metallic structure in an integrated circuit (IC)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromigration:

Data Source

PatentUS11030383B2Integrated device and method of forming the same
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD
  • US11030383B2 patent drawing
  • US11030383B2 patent drawing
  • US11030383B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of forming an integrated device includes: providing a first via pillar file specifying a first via pillar; providing a second via pillar file specifying a second via pillar; arranging, by a processor, the first via pillar to electrically connect to a circuit cell in a first circuit; arranging an interconnecting path for electrical connection of the first via pillar to another circuit cell in the first circuit; arranging, by the processor, the second via pillar to replace the first via pillar when the first via pillar induces an electromigration (EM) phenomenon; re-routing the interconnecting path with replacement of the first via pillar to generate a second circuit when the first via pillar induces the EM phenomenon; and generating the integrated device according to the second circuit.