Dynamic Video Access Control for Privacy and Alarm Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing video monitoring and alarm systems often compromise user privacy by allowing unauthorized access to video footage during non-emergency situations, which can be a concern for home users.

Innovation Solution

The system allows users to share video and event data with pre-specified third parties only during emergencies, maintaining control over the information shared and ensuring privacy during non-emergency times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the alarm system allows monitoring service access to video footage during emergencies, then alarm verification capability is improved, but user privacy is compromised during non-emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm verification capabilityVSAvoiduser privacy compromise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts access rights based on the operational state. During non-emergency conditions, the monitoring service has no access to video footage, preserving user privacy. When an alarm condition is detected, the system transitions to emergency mode and grants temporary access rights to the monitoring service, enabling alarm verification. This dynamic state-dependent access control resolves the contradiction by making the harmful factor (privacy compromise) conditional rather than permanent.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control panel serves as an intermediary between the user and the monitoring service. It mediates access to video footage by evaluating alarm conditions and controlling whether the monitoring service can access the camera. The control panel presents the user with verification options and controls the disclosure of sensitive information, acting as a gatekeeper that prevents unauthorized access while enabling verified access during emergencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If the system provides continuous access to video footage to monitoring service, then alarm verification is simplified, but unauthorized access during non-emergencies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm verification simplicityVSAvoidunauthorized access prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static access model to a dynamic one where access rights change based on the operational state. The control panel continuously monitors alarm conditions and adjusts camera access accordingly. During normal operation, the camera remains inaccessible to the monitoring service, preventing unauthorized access. When an alarm occurs, the system automatically enables verification access, simplifying the verification process while maintaining security during non-emergency periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If the user shares video data with third parties during emergencies, then alarm verification is enabled, but information control and privacy protection are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm event verificationVSAvoidinformation control and privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control panel acts as an intermediary that controls what information is shared and with whom. During non-emergency conditions, the control panel prevents any information disclosure to third parties, maintaining user privacy and information control. When an alarm condition is detected, the control panel enables selective sharing of video data with authorized third parties (such as monitoring services or emergency contacts) while maintaining control over the sharing process. The user can verify alarm conditions and control which third parties receive information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary verification of alarm conditions before sharing any information with third parties. The control panel first evaluates whether an actual alarm condition exists by reviewing camera footage and sensor data. Only after confirming a legitimate alarm does the system proceed to share information with authorized third parties. This preliminary action prevents unnecessary information disclosure while ensuring that verification is performed before any information loss occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250037558A1Video monitoring and alarm verification technology
Publication Date: 2025.01.30 ALARM COM INC
  • US20250037558A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037558A1 patent drawing
  • US20250037558A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Video monitoring and alarm verification technology, in which a first connection is established between a first device and a camera located in a monitored property associated with a user of the first device and image data captured by the camera is received over the first connection and at the first device. A determination is made to establish a second connection with a second device that enables sharing of the received image data with the second device and, in response to the determination, the second connection is established between the first device and the second device. The received image data is shared with the second device over the second connection and the second device is restricted from directly accessing image data captured by the camera located in the monitored property.