Dynamic Video Catalog Ranking by Contextual Dimensions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current video-on-demand systems fail to provide personalized and dynamic video content recommendations based on user device type, location, and timeframe, leading to inconsistent search results across different user devices.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a dynamic video content catalog system that integrates usage metrics to rank video assets by popularity within specific dimensions such as device type, location, and timeframe, allowing for personalized search results by filtering and calculating popularity values for each asset.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If video content is presented through a static catalog without personalization, then system complexity is low, but user experience and relevance of recommendations deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the video catalog into multiple ranked lists based on different dimensions (device type, location, timeframe). Each segment is independently ranked using usage metrics specific to that dimension, allowing personalized recommendations without requiring complete system reconfiguration. This segmentation enables adaptability while managing complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic ranking by continuously updating usage metrics and recalculating popularity values based on current time, location, and device type. The catalog transitions from a static structure to a dynamic one where rankings automatically adjust based on real-time usage patterns, enhancing personalization capability while the automated nature of the updates prevents excessive complexity accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If search results are consistent across all devices, then system complexity is low, but relevance to specific user contexts deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext-awarenessVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by creating context-specific ranked lists tailored to each combination of device type, location, and timeframe. Instead of applying a uniform ranking system globally, the system generates localized rankings that reflect usage patterns specific to each context, thereby improving relevance while managing complexity through targeted rather than universal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces multiple ranking dimensions (device type, location, timeframe) beyond simple popularity ranking. By adding these dimensional filters, the system creates multi-dimensional ranked lists that provide context-aware recommendations. This dimensional expansion enhances adaptability while the structured approach to multi-dimensional filtering prevents exponential complexity growth.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If popularity metrics are calculated for all video assets, then recommendation accuracy is high, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopularity measurement accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by calculating popularity metrics selectively for video assets within specific ranked lists rather than for all assets universally. The system computes usage metrics and popularity values only for assets relevant to particular device types, locations, and timeframes, thereby maintaining measurement precision for recommended content while reducing overall processing time and computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8719261B2Dynamic catalog ranking
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US8719261B2 patent drawing
  • US8719261B2 patent drawing
  • US8719261B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device receives, from a user device, a search query for video content listings in a video catalog. The device identifies, based on the search query, a set of relevant video assets from an index of the catalog content and determines dimensional values of the search query. The device determines a subset of the relevant video assets based on filtering usage metrics, for the set of relevant video assets, against the dimensional values. The device calculates a popularity value for each video asset in the subset of the relevant video assets and ranks each video asset in the subset of the relevant video assets to form a ranked list. The device sends, to the user device, a response to the search query that includes the ranked list.