Dynamic Video Masking for Privacy and Detail Observation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surveillance video processing systems fail to efficiently set masking and unmasking conditions based on the specific situation in videos, leading to inadequate privacy protection for various objects.

Innovation Solution

A video processing device and system that includes an object detector, event detector, masking target setter, and masking process controller, allowing users to set masking conditions for objects and unmasking conditions for specific events, enabling dynamic masking operations based on user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If uniform masking operations are performed on all objects of a selected type, then privacy protection is ensured, but the ability to observe detailed status of specific objects is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protectionVSAvoidobservation of object details
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating masking treatment between different spatial locations. Objects in the background area receive uniform masking for privacy protection, while objects in the foreground area (detected by event detector) remain unmasked to allow detailed observation. This resolves the contradiction by applying different masking qualities to different regions of the video frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the video frame into multiple areas: foreground area containing objects of interest and background area containing other objects. By segmenting the processing approach, the system can apply uniform masking to background objects while preserving foreground objects, thus maintaining both privacy protection and detailed observation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If masking conditions are set according to video situation, then efficient privacy protection is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of masking operationVSAvoidcomplexity of masking condition setting
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically detecting objects and events in the video, then autonomously determining which objects should be masked and which should remain unmasked. The event detector automatically identifies objects requiring detailed observation, and the masking controller automatically applies appropriate masking without requiring manual configuration, thus achieving high efficiency without increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring the system with masking rules and event detection criteria. The object detector and event detector are pre-programmed to automatically identify relevant objects and events, so when video processing occurs, the masking conditions are already established, enabling efficient real-time processing without complex runtime decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If all objects of selected type are set as masking targets, then privacy protection is comprehensive, but objects requiring detailed observation cannot be viewed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensiveness of privacy protectionVSAvoiddetailed object information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the masking status of objects dynamic rather than static. Objects can transition between masked and unmasked states based on real-time event detection. When an object becomes the focus of an event, it dynamically transitions from masked to unmasked state, allowing detailed observation while maintaining comprehensive privacy protection for non-event objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the event detector that continuously monitors objects and provides feedback to the masking controller. When specific events are detected involving certain objects, this feedback triggers the controller to adjust masking status accordingly, ensuring that objects requiring detailed observation are unmasked while maintaining comprehensive privacy protection for other objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11244488B2Video processing device, video processing system, and video processing method
Publication Date: 2022.02.08 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US11244488B2 patent drawing
  • US11244488B2 patent drawing
  • US11244488B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A video processing device includes: an object detector configured to detect an object included in a video so that a type of the object can be identified; an event detector configured to detect a focusing event which occurs to the detected object; a masking target setter configured to simultaneously set all objects of a selected type as masking targets, and to exclude from the masking targets, one or more objects to which occurrence of the selected focusing event has been detected by the event detector; and a masking process controller configured to generate a masking-processed video in which each video area which corresponds to the object set as the masking target by the masking target setter, has been changed to a masking image.