Dynamic Viscosity Control for Injection Molding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current injection molding processes are limited by the narrow range of melt flow indices (MFIs) of thermoplastic materials that can be used, as existing methods do not effectively control viscosity during the molding process, leading to restricted material selection and increased costs due to tighter MFI tolerances.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that adjust the viscosity of thermoplastic materials in real-time by monitoring melt pressure and introducing additives, allowing for the use of materials with a wider range of MFIs, including those outside conventional limits, by maintaining a substantially constant low injection pressure and using sensors to control the introduction of additives and mold temperature.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If higher molecular weight polymers are used to improve product performance, then impact resistance and stress-crack resistance are improved, but flow rate through the injection molding apparatus decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact resistance and stress-crack resistanceVSAvoidflow rate through injection molding apparatus
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamic control of viscosity during the injection molding process by continuously monitoring melt pressure and adjusting additive introduction in real-time. This allows the system to adapt viscosity dynamically to maintain optimal flow rates while using higher molecular weight polymers for improved product performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the viscosity parameter of the thermoplastic material during processing by introducing additives that modify molecular weight and flow characteristics. This enables higher molecular weight polymers to achieve both improved strength and adequate flow rates through controlled parameter changes during the molding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If tighter MFI tolerances are enforced to ensure consistent material behavior, then product quality consistency is improved, but the range of suitable resins is reduced and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMFI tolerance consistencyVSAvoidrange of suitable resins
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system that continuously monitors melt pressure during injection molding and uses this information to adjust additive introduction rates. This closed-loop feedback enables the system to compensate for variations in initial MFI values, maintaining consistent material behavior while accepting a broader range of resin specifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying viscosity through controlled additive introduction based on real-time melt pressure readings. This self-service capability allows the process to compensate for material variations without requiring tight initial MFI tolerances, thereby expanding resin selection while maintaining product consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If MFI is used as the primary qualification criterion for polymers, then material selection is simplified, but the ability to predict behavior in multi-shear-rate flows is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial selection simplicityVSAvoidviscosity measurement at injection molding shear rates
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the static MFI measurement approach with a dynamic melt pressure monitoring system that directly measures viscosity behavior under actual injection molding conditions. This substitution provides more accurate viscosity data at relevant shear rates while maintaining simplified material selection through the use of MFI as an initial screening criterion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the use of a broader range of thermoplastic materials, reducing costs and increasing material variety, while maintaining consistent product quality by dynamically adjusting viscosity and pressure to accommodate varying MFI values.

Implementation Method 1

monitoring melt pressure of the molten second thermoplastic material using a sensor and providing a signal to a controller indicative of melt pressure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

The controller controls introduction of an additive to the second thermoplastic material thereby changing a viscosity of the molten second thermoplastic material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscosity modification through additive introduction:

Implementation Method 3

A molded article is formed by reducing a mold temperature of the second thermoplastic material within the at least one mold cavity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentUS11010816B2Methods of selecting thermoplastic materials for use with plastic article forming apparatuses that control melt flow
Publication Date: 2021.05.18 PROCTER & GAMBLE CO
  • US11010816B2 patent drawing
  • US11010816B2 patent drawing
  • US11010816B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of selecting thermoplastic materials for use with an injection molding apparatus that adjusts viscosity of a thermoplastic material based on an interpreted viscosity is provided. The method includes determining a target MFI for an identified plastic article based on performance properties. A thermoplastic material supply chain is analyzed and a first thermoplastic material having a first starting MFI and a first MFI range is identified and a second thermoplastic material having a second starting MFI and a second MFI range that is greater than the first MFI range is identified and is priced less than the first thermoplastic material. The second thermoplastic material is purchased. The second thermoplastic material is tested by providing the second thermoplastic material to the injection molding apparatus for multiple shot molding cycles with the second thermoplastic material in a molten state. The step of testing includes monitoring melt pressure of the molten second thermoplastic material using a sensor and providing a signal to a controller indicative of melt pressure. The controller controls introduction of an additive to the second thermoplastic material thereby changing a viscosity of the molten second thermoplastic material based on the signal. A molded article is formed by reducing a mold temperature of the second thermoplastic material within the at least one mold cavity.