Dynamic Visual Perception Evaluation Using Adaptive Staircase Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating and improving dynamic visual perception are not optimal, particularly for speeds above 30° per second, where static and dynamic visual acuity become uncorrelated, and existing training systems like Neurovision Inc.'s show limited efficiency in enhancing dynamic visual perception.

Innovation Solution

A method involving computer-based training sessions that display moving patterns with varying visual complexity, where the level of difficulty is adjusted based on the individual's performance, using techniques such as adaptive staircases and Gabor patches to improve dynamic visual perception by progressively increasing pattern complexity and tracking eye movements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If static visual acuity evaluation is used, then measurement simplicity is improved, but measurement precision for dynamic visual perception deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoiddynamic visual perception accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation method transitions from static visual acuity measurement to dynamic visual perception measurement by introducing moving patterns with varying speeds and directions. The system adapts the motion parameters dynamically based on the individual's responses, creating a dynamic evaluation process that accurately measures visual tracking capabilities while maintaining operational feasibility through automated staircase procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the evaluation parameters from static spatial frequency alone to a combination of spatial frequency, temporal frequency, and motion direction. By varying these parameters dynamically during the test and adapting them based on performance, the system achieves precise measurement of dynamic visual perception while keeping the interface simple for users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If training intensity is increased to improve dynamic visual perception, then perception improvement is improved, but subject fatigue increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperception improvement rateVSAvoidsubject fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The training system implements periodic action by alternating between training trials and rest intervals. The staircase procedure naturally creates periods of increased difficulty followed by periods of maintenance, allowing the visual system to recover partially between challenging tasks. This periodic structure enables effective training while managing subject fatigue through built-in recovery periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback from the individual's responses to adjust training intensity dynamically. When performance drops or fatigue is detected through increased error rates, the system automatically reduces difficulty or extends rest periods. This feedback mechanism optimizes the balance between training effectiveness and fatigue management, maintaining high productivity without excessive harmful effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2265162B1Evaluation and improvement of dynamic visual perception.
Publication Date: 2017.04.05 ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL(COMPAGNIE GENERALE D OPTIQUE)
  • EP2265162B1 patent drawing
  • EP2265162B1 patent drawing
  • EP2265162B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for evaluating and/or improving dynamic visual perception of an individual, comprising: a) displaying on a screen (11) a moving pattern (12) having a chosen visual complexity feature (Simp), b) providing a human/machine interface (13, 14) enabling the individual to input a value to indicate the pattern that the individual sees on the screen, c) repeating the preceding steps in order to count the number of successive positive answers imputed at step b), and dl) if the number of successive positive comparisons exceeds a predetermined threshold (Sl), increasing (S2) the pattern visual complexity feature of a chosen amount, d2) otherwise, lowering (S7) the pattern visual complexity feature of a chosen amount, e) repeating steps dl) and d2) and lowering (Appl h, S3; S8) the chosen amount each time an alternation between steps dl) and d2) is detected, until a predetermined number (THR) of alternations (Alter) is detected, in order to determine a maximum visual complexity feature (Simp) of patterns that the individual can identify. This maximum visual complexity feature defines a quantitative value of the dynamic visual perception of the individual.