Dynamic Voltage Control for Electrical Feeders with Distributed Generators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The management of electrical feeders is complicated by the variable power generation from distributed generators, such as photovoltaic arrays and wind turbines, which makes it difficult to maintain a consistent voltage level and assess the proper operation of voltage control devices.

Innovation Solution

An improved method that dynamically groups distributed generators with demand response loads, allowing for real-time adjustments in power consumption to maintain the electrical feeder voltage at the minimum allowable level, and uses a dynamic state estimation engine to assess the operation of voltage control devices by filtering out the effects of distributed generators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conservation voltage reduction is implemented to reduce power consumption, then energy efficiency improves, but voltage stability deteriorates due to the buffer zone requirement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidvoltage stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors voltage levels and distributed generator output, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the buffer zone. When voltage is stable and within range, the system allows voltage to operate at the minimum threshold for maximum energy savings. When deviations are detected, the buffer zone automatically expands to prevent voltage excursions, resolving the contradiction between energy efficiency and voltage stability through real-time feedback control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer zone is transformed from a static fixed value to a dynamic parameter that automatically adjusts based on system conditions. The buffer zone expands when distributed generators are producing excess power or when voltage is already above the minimum threshold, and contracts when voltage is close to the minimum and energy savings are prioritized. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by making the stability margin adaptive rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the voltage buffer zone is increased to ensure voltage never drops below minimum acceptable levels, then voltage stability improves, but the effectiveness of conservation voltage reduction diminishes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of maintaining a full buffer zone continuously, the system applies partial buffer zone adjustment only when necessary. The buffer zone is dynamically reduced to minimal levels during periods when voltage is stable and energy savings are critical, while being increased only partially and temporarily when voltage deviations are detected. This partial action approach maximizes energy savings while providing sufficient voltage protection only when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the buffer zone parameter dynamically based on operating conditions, transforming it from a constant safety margin to a variable parameter. The buffer zone size is adjusted in real-time based on voltage measurements, distributed generator output levels, and load conditions, allowing the system to optimize between energy savings and voltage stability by modifying this critical parameter adaptively rather than maintaining a fixed conservative value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If distributed generators are integrated to provide variable power generation, then energy sustainability improves, but voltage control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy sustainabilityVSAvoidvoltage control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the control of distributed generators with the voltage control function, combining previously separate control tasks into a unified system. The distributed generator output and voltage regulation are coordinated through a single control framework that simultaneously manages power injection and voltage levels, reducing the overall complexity despite the addition of distributed generators. This merging allows the system to handle variable generation and voltage control as an integrated problem rather than separate challenges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The voltage control devices are given multi-functionality, serving both traditional voltage regulation purposes and the new function of coordinating with distributed generators. The same control infrastructure manages both voltage levels and distributed generator integration, eliminating the need for separate specialized control systems. This universality reduces complexity by using existing devices for multiple purposes rather than adding dedicated equipment for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the voltage buffer zone is maintained above minimum levels, then voltage stability improves, but measurement precision for assessing voltage control device operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevoltage stabilityVSAvoidvoltage control device assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of voltage control device effectiveness by comparing actual voltage measurements with predicted voltages that account for the distributed generator buffer zone effects. Before making assessments, the system calculates what voltage changes should occur based on known device operations and distributed generator characteristics, then compares these predictions with actual measurements. This preliminary comparison approach maintains the buffer zone for stability while preserving measurement precision through predictive modeling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary predictive model that mediates between the voltage buffer zone and the assessment process. This model predicts the voltage effects of distributed generator variability and buffer zone adjustments, allowing the assessment system to distinguish between voltage changes caused by buffer zone maintenance and those caused by voltage control device operations. The intermediary model acts as a filter that separates these effects, maintaining both voltage stability and assessment accuracy simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10082814B2Method of operating an electrical feeder
Publication Date: 2018.09.25 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US10082814B2 patent drawing
  • US10082814B2 patent drawing
  • US10082814B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of operating an electrical feeder permits the electrical feeder voltage to be maintained at the minimum voltage within a voltage range based upon dynamic grouping together of electrical generators on the electrical feeder with demand response loads on the electrical feeder. A method of assessing the proper operation of a voltage control device on the electrical feeder involves detecting a number of properties of the electrical power in the electrical feeder both prior to and subsequent to a change in an operational parameter of a voltage control device. An expected effect upon the electrical feeder of one or more distributed generators is filtered from this in order to determine a net effect of the voltage control device itself on the electrical feeder. Based upon the detected net effect and a predicted baseline effect for the voltage control device, it can be determined whether the voltage control device is functioning properly.