Dynamic Wagering Control for Multi-Player Gaming Systems
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current wagering games often exclude casual players and those with lower bankrolls due to high stakes and uneven skill levels, leading to a lack of inclusivity and increased dropout rates, as experienced players with larger bankrolls can force opponents to fold through repeated raises.
Innovation Solution
A gaming system that allows players to choose between high risk and low risk modes, where the opportunity to raise alternates between players, preventing one player from repeatedly increasing stakes and forcing others out, and includes features like a visible token for wagering control, ensuring fair play and maintaining player engagement.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If players with larger bankrolls can repeatedly raise stakes, then experienced players can force opponents to fold and win more, but casual players and those with lower bankrolls are excluded and dropout rates increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements dynamic wagering control where the system monitors bankroll sizes and adjusts raising permissions in real-time. Players with insufficient bankrolls relative to current stakes receive dynamic restrictions on their ability to raise, preventing them from being forced out by opponents with larger bankrolls. This dynamic adaptation maintains game participation across diverse player types.
Solution Approach 2:
The system continuously monitors player bankroll sizes and provides feedback control on wagering actions. When a player's bankroll falls below a threshold relative to current stakes, the system feedback-restricts their raising capability. This feedback mechanism ensures players can remain in games appropriate to their bankroll levels, improving retention while maintaining game integrity.
2Ease of operation
If one player can constantly raise stakes, then that player can force opponents into difficult decisions and potentially win more, but the game becomes unbalanced and less enjoyable for casual players
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces a central controller as an intermediary between players that automatically monitors bankroll sizes and enforces raising restrictions. This intermediary eliminates the need for complex manual tracking and negotiation among players, automatically applying fair play rules based on bankroll thresholds while keeping the interface simple for end users.
Solution Approach 2:
The system implements self-service wagering control where the automated controller monitors player actions and independently applies raising restrictions based on pre-set bankroll thresholds. Players simply participate in normal gameplay while the system autonomously enforces fairness rules, reducing operational complexity for players while ensuring fair play.
3Productivity
If the game allows high stakes wagering, then experienced players with larger bankrolls can win more, but casual players are hesitant to participate
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies local quality control by implementing different wagering rules for different players based on their individual bankroll sizes. Rather than a uniform high-stakes environment, the system creates localized wagering conditions where each player operates within bankroll-appropriate parameters. This allows high wagering volume among eligible players while maintaining accessibility for casual players with smaller bankrolls.
Data Source
AI summary
A gaming system and method provides wagering control features for application in multi-stakes, multi-player wagering games. Players have the option to choose one of a plurality of different modes at the beginning of a gaming session. Depending on which mode is selected, the wagering control feature or features available to players during game play will be different.