Dynamic Wayfinding in Hazardous Environments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fire safety systems in buildings are static and limited in detecting and responding to hazards such as heat, smoke, and harmful gases, often directing individuals towards the fire rather than to the safest exit.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for wayfinding in hazardous environments that utilizes real-time data streams from sensors like temperature, smoke, and carbon monoxide detectors, along with imaging and audio devices, to detect alarm conditions and dynamically calculate the safest evacuation routes, which are then displayed on digital signage and communicated to individuals through various devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed signage or lighting is used to indicate emergency exits, then the system is simple and reliable, but it directs people towards the fire rather than to the safest exit

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of evacuationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic wayfinding by replacing static signage with digital displays that can change in real-time based on sensor data. The system continuously updates evacuation route recommendations as hazard conditions change, allowing the guidance system to adapt dynamically to the evolving fire situation rather than following fixed predetermined paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates real-time feedback loops where sensors continuously monitor temperature, smoke density, and carbon monoxide levels, and this data feeds back to the wayfinding algorithm which then updates the recommended evacuation routes. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures that the guidance system responds to actual hazard conditions rather than relying on pre-programmed static routes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time sensor data is processed to determine safest routes, then the safety is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of route recommendationVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical or manual route determination systems with computational algorithms that process sensor data. Instead of using physical models or manual assessment, the system uses software-based pathfinding algorithms that can rapidly calculate safest routes by processing temperature, smoke, and gas concentration data from distributed sensors throughout the building

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs multi-functional sensing devices that can detect multiple hazard parameters (temperature, smoke density, carbon monoxide) simultaneously, and a universal wayfinding algorithm that handles various emergency scenarios. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized systems while maintaining high accuracy in route recommendation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If multiple sensing devices are deployed to detect hazards, then the detection accuracy is improved, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection accuracyVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple sensing functions into integrated sensor nodes that simultaneously measure temperature, smoke density, and carbon monoxide concentration. By combining these detection capabilities into unified sensing units distributed throughout the building, the system achieves comprehensive hazard detection accuracy while avoiding the complexity of separate independent sensing systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds spatial dimensionality to hazard detection by deploying sensors at multiple locations and heights throughout the building. This three-dimensional distribution of sensing points provides comprehensive coverage and enables the wayfinding algorithm to calculate gradient-based safest paths, transforming single-point detection into multi-dimensional hazard mapping

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively directs individuals to the quickest and safest exit routes by considering real-time hazard data, reducing the risk of injury and improving evacuation efficiency during emergencies.

Implementation Method 1

sensing devices comprise a temperature sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal radiation detection: Infrared Radiation

Implementation Method 2

sensing devices comprise a smoke detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering by particles: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

sensing devices comprise a carbon monoxide detector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectChemical detection:

Implementation Method 4

sensing devices comprise a microphone

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic wave detection: Sound

Implementation Method 5

sensing devices comprise an imaging device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight detection: Light

Data Source

PatentUS12333928B2Systems and methods for wayfinding in hazardous environments
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US12333928B2 patent drawing
  • US12333928B2 patent drawing
  • US12333928B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for wayfinding in hazardous environments are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method for wayfinding in a hazardous environment may include: (1) receiving, at an emergency response computer program executed by an electronic device, a plurality of real time streams of data, each real time stream of data from a sensing device in an area; (2) detecting, by the emergency response computer program, an alarm condition in the area based on the real-time streams of data; (3) determining, by the emergency response computer program, that the alarm condition satisfies an alarm condition rule; (4) calculating, by the emergency response computer program, a plurality of routes to an egress point from the area; and (5) controlling, by the emergency response computer program, a digital signage in the area to display one of the plurality of routes the egress point.