Dynamic Workload Management for Processor Core Clusters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current workload scheduling technologies face challenges in dynamically adapting to varying performance requirements, as they often rely on static topologies and external data, leading to inefficiencies in resource allocation and performance penalties when switching between processor core configurations.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a dynamic workload management system that partitions CPU cores into clusters, allowing for intelligent selection of processor core configurations based on cost analysis and performance metrics, enabling efficient distribution of workloads across processor cores without performance defects, even when split into multiple cores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If static topology and external data are used for workload scheduling, then implementation complexity is reduced, but adaptability to varying performance requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to performance requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic topology generation that adapts to varying workload characteristics. The system generates processor topologies dynamically based on workload analysis rather than using fixed static topologies, allowing the scheduling system to adapt to different performance requirements while maintaining manageable complexity through automated topology generation algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If processor cores are split into multiple cores, then resource utilization is improved, but performance penalties occur during configuration switching

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilizationVSAvoidswitching penalty time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary topology generation and evaluation before actual workload execution. By pre-generating multiple candidate topologies and evaluating their suitability, the system minimizes switching penalties when configuration changes are needed, as the next configuration is already prepared and validated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs cost functions that evaluate multiple parameters when determining topology switching decisions. By analyzing cost metrics related to performance, resource utilization, and switching overhead, the system intelligently determines when configuration changes are beneficial versus when to maintain current configurations to avoid unnecessary switching penalties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If dynamic topology generation is implemented, then adaptability to workload requirements is improved, but computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetopology adaptabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses cost functions to evaluate topology configurations based on multiple parameters including performance metrics and resource utilization. This parameter-based evaluation allows the system to identify optimal topologies efficiently without exhaustive search, balancing adaptability with computational cost by focusing evaluation on relevant performance parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240126599A1Methods and apparatus to manage workloads for an operating system
Publication Date: 2024.04.18 INTEL CORP
  • US20240126599A1 patent drawing
  • US20240126599A1 patent drawing
  • US20240126599A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatus, articles of manufacture, and methods are disclosed to manage workloads for an operating system wherein it causes programmable circuitry to cause a task of a workload to be executed with a first processor core configuration; cause the task to be executed with a second processor core configuration; compare a first performance metric of the execution of the task with the first processor core configuration to a second performance metric of the execution with the second processor core configuration; and cause to be used one of the first processor core configuration or the second processor core configuration based on the comparison.