Dynamic Workspace Targeting with Crowdsourced Context

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional virtualization techniques in Information Handling Systems (IHS) are inefficient in adapting to dynamic user contexts and security risks, leading to increased complexity, memory consumption, and decreased productivity due to their inability to account for real-time user intentions and changing environments.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic workspace targeting system that utilizes crowdsourced user context information to validate applications, determining their execution based on productivity and security context, allowing secure and efficient access to protected data across various IHS environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional virtualization techniques are used to secure access to protected data, then security isolation is improved, but device complexity and memory consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity isolationVSAvoidvirtualization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic workspace configuration that adapts to user context and security requirements. Instead of static virtualization environments, the system dynamically adjusts workspace parameters based on real-time user behavior, device state, and security context, reducing unnecessary complexity while maintaining security isolation where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies security isolation selectively rather than uniformly across all workspaces. By analyzing user context and security requirements, the patent creates localized security boundaries only where necessary, reducing overall system complexity and memory consumption while maintaining adequate security protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If conventional virtualization techniques implement all security protocols for all users, then security protection is improved, but productivity decreases due to resource consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity protectionVSAvoiduser productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes security parameters based on user context, device state, and risk assessment. Instead of applying fixed security protocols to all users, the system adjusts security measures in real-time, reducing resource consumption for low-risk users while maintaining strong protection for high-risk scenarios, thereby improving productivity without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements security protocols partially rather than fully for all users. By assessing risk levels and user contexts, the patent applies only the necessary security measures for each specific situation, avoiding excessive security overhead that would degrade productivity while ensuring adequate protection where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If conventional virtualization environments provide support for many capabilities, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and resource usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapability supportVSAvoidvirtualization overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic capability provisioning where workspace capabilities are adjusted based on real-time user context and task requirements. Instead of pre-configuring all possible capabilities, the system activates only those needed for current tasks, reducing device complexity and resource usage while maintaining adaptability when new capabilities are required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If security systems extend defenses to remote IHSs, then security coverage is improved, but ease of operation decreases due to administration burden

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidadministration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service security where the system automatically assesses risk, configures appropriate security measures, and manages workspace security without requiring manual administrator intervention. The system autonomously extends security coverage to remote IHSs by evaluating contextual factors and applying appropriate protections, reducing administration burden while maintaining comprehensive security coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11657126B2Systems and methods for dynamic workspace targeting with crowdsourced user context
Publication Date: 2023.05.23 DELL PROD LP
  • US11657126B2 patent drawing
  • US11657126B2 patent drawing
  • US11657126B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for dynamic workspace targeting with crowdsourced user context are described. In some embodiments, an Information Handling System (IHS) of a workspace orchestration service may include a processor; and a memory coupled to the processor, the memory having program instructions stored thereon that, upon execution by the processor, cause the IHS to: detect execution of an application in a workspace instantiated by a client IHS; validate the application based upon productivity context information and security context information received from the client IHS; and in response to the validation, distribute the validated application to another workspace instantiated by another client IHS.