Driver Assistance Alerts Using End-to-End AI Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current autonomous driving technologies face challenges in scalability, safety, and reliability due to the need for massive volumes of training data, high costs, and limitations in generalizing to diverse and unfamiliar driving scenarios, particularly in corner and edge cases such as extreme weather and unexpected road hazards.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of an end-to-end (E2E) neural network architecture for autonomous driving that uses conditional imitation learning and memory-augmented transformers to process sensory inputs and generate prescriptive steering and speed control actions, reducing dependency on complex map data and enabling context-aware learning through reinforcement and imitation learning strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional autonomous driving systems use aggregation of independent submodules with manually labelled data, then the system can achieve basic driving functions, but the training data volume required becomes enormous and the cost becomes expensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and reliabilityVSAvoidtraining data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple independent submodules into a single end-to-end neural network that processes sensory inputs and generates driving actions in one unified model, eliminating the need for separate manually labelled training datasets for each module and reducing overall data requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The end-to-end neural network performs multiple functions simultaneously - processing various sensory inputs (camera, LiDAR, radar), understanding the environment, and generating driving actions - all within a single universal model that learns from diverse driving scenarios without requiring separate specialised training data for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional autonomous driving systems use pre-built maps and manually labelled data, then the system can operate in familiar environments, but the capacity to react to situations where the real-world environment does not correlate to the map becomes limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety in familiar environmentsVSAvoidreaction capacity to unfamiliar situations
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-built maps to a dynamic end-to-end neural network that continuously adapts to real-time environmental conditions, allowing the vehicle to respond flexibly to unfamiliar situations by learning from diverse training data representing various driving scenarios and environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The end-to-end neural network learns to interpret and navigate unfamiliar environments autonomously by processing raw sensory inputs and generating appropriate driving actions without relying on pre-built maps or manual annotations, enabling the system to adapt to new situations through its own learning capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If end-to-end neural networks are used for autonomous driving, then scalability and efficiency are improved, but the need to validate and test the model to achieve regulatory safety standards becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability and efficiencyVSAvoidvalidation and testing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the end-to-end neural network's performance is continuously evaluated against safety standards and regulatory requirements, with the model being refined and retrained based on validation results to achieve compliance while maintaining scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary validation and testing during the model training phase by incorporating diverse driving scenarios and edge cases into the training dataset, allowing the end-to-end neural network to learn safe and compliant driving behaviors before deployment, thereby simplifying subsequent regulatory validation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250002046A1System And Methods For Providing Driver Assistance Alerts Using An End-To-End Artificially Intelligent Collision Avoidance System And Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 HYPRLABS INC
  • US20250002046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250002046A1 patent drawing
  • US20250002046A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The technology disclosed teaches a system and methods for providing driver assistance alerts to a driver using an end-to-end artificially-intelligent advanced driver assistance system. The technology disclosed further includes receiving environmental data for a sequence of driving states including at least video from a camera, returns from an optical sensor, and location data from a GNSS receiver, wherein the camera, the optical sensor, and the GNSS receiver are coupled to a processor carried by a vehicle, processing the environmental data as input to an end-to-end neural network, wherein the end-to-end neural network is trained to generate prescriptive steering and speed control actions in response to a present driving state, analyzing hidden layer data and output data from the end-to-end neural network to estimate collision avoidance data, and presenting, to the driver, a user interface including driver assistance alerts based on the collision avoidance data.