E911 Call Trigger via Ut Interface for PSAP Callbacks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to ensure callbacks from Public Safety Access Points (PSAPs) to user devices can be completed despite call restrictions, such as parental controls or 'do not disturb' settings, which can block essential emergency communications.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that use the Ut interface to generate a trigger to suspend call restrictions on user devices, allowing callbacks from PSAPs by transmitting a request through an XCAP message to a server, enabling temporary suspension of restrictions during emergency calls and logging the user device for subsequent callbacks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If call restrictions are implemented on user devices, then parental controls and do not disturb functionality are improved, but emergency callback communication from PSAP is blocked

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparental controlsVSAvoidemergency callback
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by proactively suspending call restrictions before the emergency callback is attempted. When an emergency call is detected, the network node sends a suspension trigger to the user device to disable restrictions in advance, ensuring the callback pathway is clear before it is needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The network node acts as an intermediary between the PSAP and the user device. It receives the suspension trigger from the PSAP, processes the restriction suspension request, and communicates with the user device to implement the suspension, thereby mediating the conflict between restrictions and emergency communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If call restrictions are suspended to allow PSAP callbacks, then emergency communication reliability is improved, but user device restriction settings are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemergency callbackVSAvoidcall restriction settings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The call restriction settings are made dynamic rather than static. The system automatically adjusts the restriction state based on emergency conditions - suspending them during emergency calls and automatically restoring them afterward. This dynamic behavior allows the system to adapt to different operational contexts without permanent user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter state of call restrictions from enabled to suspended temporarily during emergency communication. This parameter change is time-bound and condition-specific, allowing emergency callbacks while maintaining the original restriction parameters for normal operation. The automatic restoration after emergency calls ensures parameters return to their original state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If standard callback procedures are used, then system simplicity is maintained, but callbacks are blocked by existing call restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecallback procedureVSAvoidcallback completion
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The restriction suspension functionality is extracted as a separate, independent mechanism from the standard callback procedure. The network node handles restriction suspension as a distinct action triggered by emergency detection, separate from the normal callback routing and connection establishment processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The network node is given multi-functionality by integrating both the emergency detection capability and the restriction suspension control in a single component. This universal node handles both identifying emergency calls and managing the restriction state, eliminating the need for separate complex systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10433145B2System and method for device-based E911 call trigger
Publication Date: 2019.10.01 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10433145B2 patent drawing
  • US10433145B2 patent drawing
  • US10433145B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method includes initiating an emergency call, responsive to the initiating step, generating a trigger, wherein the trigger comprises a request to suspend a call restriction associated with a user device, and transmitting the trigger using a Ut interface to a server to suspend the call restriction.