Electric Arc Furnace Roof Delta Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric arc furnace (EAF) roof systems, particularly refractory deltas, are excessively heavy, costly, and have a short lifespan due to their large size and proximity to the molten metal, leading to inadequate cooling and frequent replacements.

Innovation Solution

A roof system design featuring a smaller refractory delta that fits onto a refractory-lined skew, with a method involving molding and casting techniques to create these components, allowing for efficient cooling and extended lifespan by reducing exposure to extreme temperatures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If prior art refractory deltas are made large and deep to match skew dimensions, then structural stability is improved, but weight increases and lifespan decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddelta weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention separates the delta from the skew, making the delta a independent component that is smaller in size. The delta is no longer required to match the skew's dimensions, allowing it to be segmented into a more manageable size that reduces weight while maintaining structural stability through its own optimized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimensional parameters of the delta, making it smaller and shallower than prior art designs. This parameter change reduces the delta's weight and exposes it to less thermal stress, thereby extending its lifespan while still providing the necessary structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Stability of the object's composition

If prior art refractory deltas are made large and deep, then structural stability is improved, but lifespan decreases due to increased thermal exposure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoiddelta lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the delta from the skew and making it an independent, smaller component, the invention reduces the delta's exposure to thermal stress. The smaller size means less thermal mass and reduced thermal cycling, which extends the lifespan of the refractory material while maintaining structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimensional parameters of the delta to make it smaller and shallower, reducing its exposure to extreme temperatures. This parameter change directly extends the lifespan of the refractory material by reducing thermal stress and oxidation exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If prior art water-cooled skews are made massive to support the delta, then structural strength is improved, but cooling effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskew strengthVSAvoidcooling effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSTemperature

Solution Approach 1:

By separating the delta from the skew, the invention allows the skew to be optimized for its cooling function rather than supporting a massive delta. The skew can maintain its structural strength while having improved cooling effectiveness due to reduced thermal mass and better heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimensional parameters of the skew, making it less massive while maintaining sufficient strength. This parameter change improves cooling effectiveness by reducing thermal mass and enhancing heat dissipation, while the skew still provides adequate structural support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Stability of the object's composition

If prior art refractory deltas are made large, then structural stability is improved, but construction and replacement costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidconstruction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the delta into a smaller, independent component, the invention reduces the amount of refractory material required. This segmentation leads to lower construction costs for initial installation and reduced replacement costs when the delta wears out, while maintaining structural stability through optimized design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the dimensional parameters of the delta to make it smaller and more cost-effective to manufacture and install. This parameter change reduces material costs and labor requirements while maintaining sufficient structural stability through optimized geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The new design reduces construction and replacement costs while extending the lifespan of the roof system components by improving cooling efficiency and reducing thermal stress on refractory materials.

Implementation Method 1

Deltas are composed of refractory material in order to prevent electricity from arcing between the electrodes and the delta

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical insulation: Electrical Resistance

Implementation Method 2

Refractory material is a non-metallic material that will not conduct electricity from the electrodes and will maintain its physical and chemical properties when exposed to high temperatures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal stability: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 3

the skew (also known as a water-cooled skew or a delta water ring) is in contact with the furnace and often includes a circuitry of water pipes, which are designed to cool the roof system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS8780952B2Roof system for electric arc furnace and method for manufacturing the same
Publication Date: 2014.07.15 SCHWER JOHN W
  • US8780952B2 patent drawing
  • US8780952B2 patent drawing
  • US8780952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roof system for an electric arc furnace includes a skew removably attached to the electric arc furnace, a lining of refractory material affixed to the skew, and a delta composed of a refractory material. The delta has at least one aperture capable of receiving an electrode. The delta fits onto and is supported by the refractory lining that is affixed to the skew.