Ear Canal Pressurization Device Using Linear Motor

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current ear canal pressurization systems for aural acoustic immittance testing are noisy, prone to leaks, require complex calibration, and have limited maintenance-free lifespan, failing to meet the requirements of quiet operation, linear pressure control, and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A dual flexible chamber apparatus driven by a moving magnet linear motor, which uses DC or AC voltage to generate static or alternating ear canal pressures, minimizing noise and eliminating the need for complex drive mechanisms and valves, with flexible chambers providing elastic suspension and long-lasting operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If syringe/plunger systems are used for ear canal pressurization, then pressure control is achieved, but noise is generated and requires acoustic damping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure control reliabilityVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical syringe/plunger system with a pneumatic diaphragm system. The diaphragm is driven by pressure changes in a control chamber, eliminating the need for mechanical gears, linkages, and acoustic damping components. This substitution of mechanical systems with a pneumatic system resolves the noise issue while maintaining pressure control reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Power

If stepper motors with rotary-to-linear gear drives are used, then pressure generation is achieved, but device complexity increases and maintenance is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure generation capabilityVSAvoiddrive mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates stepper motors, gear drives, and associated control electronics by using a pneumatic diaphragm system. The diaphragm's movement is directly controlled by pressure changes in the control chamber, creating a simple, maintenance-free system that generates the required pressure without complex mechanical or electronic components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If oscillating diaphragm pumps are used, then pressure control is achieved, but tuning and calibration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepressure controlVSAvoidcalibration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces oscillating diaphragm pumps with a statically positioned diaphragm controlled by pneumatic pressure. This eliminates the need for tuning the diaphragm's natural frequency or calibrating oscillation characteristics, as the system responds directly to applied pressure without requiring dynamic balancing or frequency matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Power

If peristaltic pumps are used, then air pressure is generated, but tubing requires periodic replacement due to stress

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair pressure generationVSAvoidtubing lifespan
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates peristaltic pumps and their associated flexible tubing by using a rigid diaphragm system controlled by pneumatic pressure. This substitution removes the mechanical stress and fatigue issues that cause tubing to fail, resulting in a maintenance-free system with no consumable parts requiring replacement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

5Object-generated harmful factors

If piezo electric motors are used, then quiet operation is achieved, but high voltage and sophisticated controllers are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise levelVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces piezoelectric motors with a pneumatic diaphragm system. This eliminates the need for high-voltage drivers and sophisticated controllers, as the diaphragm is simply actuated by pressure changes in the control chamber. The system achieves quiet operation through pneumatic actuation without requiring complex electronic control circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution operates quietly, reduces the need for acoustic damping, provides stable and linear pressure control, and has a virtually unlimited maintenance-free lifespan, making it suitable for accurate aural acoustic immittance testing.

Implementation Method 1

A purpose of the preferred embodiments of the present invention is to provide an ear canal pressurization device optimized for use during aural acoustic immittance testing. The disclosed device is comprised of a rigid mounting framework which holds in position a forcer assembly, a motor assembly, a first chamber assembly, and a second chamber assembly.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLorentz force: Lorentz Force

Implementation Method 2

The first flexible chamber provides elastic suspension for a first end of the motor assembly, and the second flexible chamber provides symmetrical elastic suspension for a second end of the motor assembly.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 3

The internal volume of the first flexible chamber is coupled to an ear canal via an air line so that changes in said internal volume produce changes in ear canal pressure re Boyle's law.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBoyle's law: Boyle's Law

Data Source

PatentUS8398562B2Ear canal pressurization device
Publication Date: 2013.03.19 MICRO AUDIOMETRICS CORP
  • US8398562B2 patent drawing
  • US8398562B2 patent drawing
  • US8398562B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ear canal pressurization device optimized for aural acoustic immittance testing is disclosed. Changes in volume of a first flexible chamber, due to motor movement, produce changes in ear canal pressure based on Boyle's law. A vent may be opened to allow ear canal pressure to gently equalize to ambient air pressure or to generate ear canal pressure sweeps free of pressure baseline offset. The vent may be closed to set a static ear canal pressure or to generate ear canal pressure sweeps with an incidental baseline offset. The vent may be controlled to generate ear canal pressure sweeps with an intended baseline offset. The device produces ear canal pressure proportional to drive voltage, so any desired pressure versus time function can be generated by applying a coil driving voltage with the appropriate amplitude versus time function.