Ear Tip Sealing Structure with Multi-Durometer Legs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing in-ear earpieces face challenges in providing a comfortable fit and effective seal within the ear canal while maintaining structural support for earbuds, often resulting in poor noise reduction and discomfort due to inadequate positioning and sealing structures.

Innovation Solution

The in-ear ear tip is designed with a body shaped to fit the lower concha, an angled nozzle for sound conduction, a frusto-conical sealing structure with constant thickness for improved sealing, and a retaining structure with tapered legs for stability, using materials of varying hardness to balance comfort and support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the sealing structure is made softer to improve comfort, then comfort is improved, but structural support capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecomfortVSAvoidstructural support
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The ear tip employs multi-durometer materials where different regions have different hardness levels. The sealing structure uses a softer durometer (e.g., 20-30 Shore A) for comfort against the ear canal, while the body and retaining structure use harder materials (e.g., 40-60 Shore A) for structural support. This local differentiation allows each region to optimize its properties independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ear tip is constructed as a composite structure combining materials with different durometers in a single molded piece or assembled configuration. The inner body and outer body layers have different hardness characteristics, creating a composite material system that simultaneously provides soft sealing surfaces and rigid structural framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Stability of the object's composition

If the retaining structure is made stiffer to improve positioning stability, then positioning stability is improved, but comfort deteriorates due to excessive pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning stabilityVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The retaining structure uses a intermediate durometer (e.g., 30-50 Shore A) that is stiffer than the sealing structure but softer than the core body. This creates a gradient of stiffness where the retaining structure provides adequate positioning force without transmitting excessive pressure to the ear canal, maintaining both stability and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The retaining structure is designed with tapered legs that can flex and adapt to different ear geometries. The structure transitions from a rigid attachment at the body to a more compliant tip, allowing dynamic adjustment to the wearer's ear shape while maintaining stable positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the sealing structure is made larger to improve seal effectiveness, then noise reduction is improved, but comfort deteriorates due to excessive pressure on the ear canal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing structure uses a soft durometer material (e.g., 20-30 Shore A) that is significantly softer than the body material. This allows the sealing surface to conform to the ear canal walls and create an effective seal through material compliance rather than through size or pressure, reducing the seal diameter while maintaining sealing effectiveness and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Strength

If the body material is made harder to improve structural support, then structural support is improved, but comfort deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidcomfort
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The body uses a harder durometer (e.g., 40-60 Shore A) optimized for structural support and maintaining the ear tip's geometric integrity. However, this harder material is only used in regions not直接接触 the ear canal, while softer materials are used for sealing and retaining structures that contact the ear, localizing the hardness benefit to structural areas only.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The ear tip employs a composite construction with multiple material layers of different durometers. The inner body and outer body have different hardness characteristics, creating a composite structure where the harder outer layer provides structural support while softer inner layers or adjacent components provide comfort interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Data Source

PatentUS10820084B2Ear tip sealing structure
Publication Date: 2020.10.27 BOSE CORP
  • US10820084B2 patent drawing
  • US10820084B2 patent drawing
  • US10820084B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects describe an earpiece with structure for positioning and retaining the earpiece and with structure for sealing against the entrance to the ear canal. According to aspects, the retaining structure has at least one substantially elliptical leg configured to follow the curve of the anti-helix and/or the cymba concha at the rear of the concha. The leg increases in thickness from a tip of the earpiece towards the body of the earpiece. The sealing structure is substantially frusto-conical and extends from a nozzle. The nozzle is angled to align with ear geometry. In an example, he sealing structure has a slight radius on an outer surface of the sealing structure. In another example, the sealing structure has a substantially constant thickness from the nozzle to the wide end of the sealing structure.