Ear-Worn EEG and Motion Sensing for Reaction Time Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wearable devices struggle to accurately track changes in reaction time, which can be indicative of various pathologies and pose safety risks, particularly in contexts like driving or sleep disorders.

Innovation Solution

Ear-worn devices equipped with accelerometers and EEG sensors monitor movement and brain activity to determine changes in reaction time, generating recommendations for the user or medical providers, and can adjust therapy settings or engage safety features.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If wearable devices use accelerometers to track movement, then reaction time monitoring is enabled, but measurement precision is insufficient to accurately detect changes in reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction time detection accuracyVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines accelerometers with EEG sensors in ear-worn devices to create a multi-sensor system. The accelerometer captures movement data while the EEG sensor captures brain activity, and their combined data enables precise reaction time monitoring that neither sensor could achieve alone, resolving the measurement precision issue without excessive complexity increase

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The ear-worn device performs multiple functions: it monitors reaction time through accelerometer data, detects fatigue through EEG patterns, tracks sleep stages, and provides therapeutic feedback. This multi-functionality allows the device to achieve high measurement precision for reaction time while managing overall system complexity through integrated design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If real-time reaction time tracking is implemented, then proactive safety interventions are enabled, but device complexity increases due to multiple sensors and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsensor and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments monitoring into distinct functional components: accelerometer-based movement detection, EEG-based brain activity monitoring, reaction time calculation module, and safety intervention module. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to provide reliable safety monitoring with manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The device implements feedback loops where EEG data about fatigue is continuously monitored and fed back to adjust alert thresholds and intervention strategies. This feedback mechanism improves reliability by adapting to individual user baselines and fatigue patterns, while the automated feedback reduces manual intervention requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple sensors are integrated into ear-worn devices, then comprehensive health monitoring is achieved, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehealth monitoring capabilitiesVSAvoidsensor integration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a nested design where the accelerometer and EEG sensors are integrated within a compact ear-worn housing that fits within the ear canal. The sensors are nested in a way that allows them to work together spatially without requiring ultra-precise alignment, achieving comprehensive monitoring with practical manufacturing tolerances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes in signal processing to compensate for manufacturing variations. By continuously calibrating sensor readings against individual user baselines and adjusting detection thresholds dynamically, the system maintains high adaptability for health monitoring while reducing the impact of manufacturing precision variations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Real-time detection of changing reaction times allows for proactive interventions to prevent accidents and health issues, such as fatigue-related incidents and pathologies like dementia, by providing alerts, adjusting therapy parameters, or engaging autonomous driving features.

Implementation Method 1

The first ear-worn device includes an accelerometer that provides acceleration data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcceleration: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS20260053422A1Tracking reaction time using ear-worn devices
Publication Date: 2026.02.26 RESMED PTY LTD
  • US20260053422A1 patent drawing
  • US20260053422A1 patent drawing
  • US20260053422A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An ear-worn device may include an accelerometer and/or an electroencephalography (EEG) sensor to provide recommendations based on user activity and/or physiological responses. The ear-worn device may use the accelerometer to capture acceleration data to assess the wearer's movement rate, and detect changes. Using data from the EEG sensor, the processor may detect eyelid blinks and other signals of fatigue. The processor may generate a treatment recommendation based on any combination of the movement rate, changes, eyelid blinks, and/or signals of fatigue.