Ear-Worn Audio Spatial Focusing for Multi-Speaker Noise Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ear-worn devices face challenges in noise reduction, particularly in scenarios with multiple speakers, due to warped beamforming patterns caused by the wearer's head and torso, limited sound reduction capabilities, and performance issues in reverberant environments, with beamforming being more effective for high-frequency sounds and adding noise in quiet environments.

Innovation Solution

Implementing neural networks for spatial focusing in ear-worn devices, which apply different weights to audio signals based on sound source locations, using multiple microphones to distinguish between target and interfering speakers, and independently controlling background noise and interfering speech volumes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional beamforming is used to reduce noise and interfering speakers, then sound reduction from certain directions is improved, but the beamforming pattern becomes warped due to interference from the head, torso, and ear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidbeamforming pattern accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical/acoustic beamforming with a neural network-based spatial focusing system. The neural network learns optimal filtering operations from training data, substituting the rigid mathematical beamforming patterns with adaptive, data-driven filters that are not constrained by the warped acoustic patterns caused by head and torso interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed beamforming patterns to dynamic, learnable filtering parameters. The neural network adjusts its internal parameters (weights and biases) based on training data, allowing the system to adapt to different acoustic environments and speaker configurations rather than relying on predetermined beamforming patterns that become warped.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If conventional beamforming is used, then high-frequency sound localization is improved, but low-frequency sound reduction is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound localization accuracyVSAvoidlow-frequency noise reduction
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network is trained to handle multiple frequency ranges simultaneously by using spectrogram inputs that capture both low and high-frequency information. The network learns to apply appropriate filtering at different frequencies through its trained weights, overcoming the inherent limitation of conventional beamforming that works better for high frequencies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional beamforming is used in reverberant environments, then direct sound focusing is improved, but indirect reverberant paths from the front are not attenuated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesound focusingVSAvoidreverberant noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network substitutes the directional-based beamforming approach with a data-driven approach that learns to identify and filter reverberant components. By training on data that includes reverberant environments, the network learns temporal and spectral patterns characteristic of reverberation and can attenuate them even when they arrive from the front direction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional beamforming is used in quiet environments, then noise reduction is improved, but additional noise is added to the output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenoise reductionVSAvoidbeamforming-induced noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network applies filtering operations that are adapted to the specific acoustic conditions. In quiet environments, the trained network can modulate its filtering strength to avoid excessive processing that would introduce artifacts, whereas conventional beamforming applies fixed patterns regardless of environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12470880B2Ear-worn device with neural network-based noise modification and/or spatial focusing
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 FORTELL RESEARCH INC
  • US12470880B2 patent drawing
  • US12470880B2 patent drawing
  • US12470880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ear-worn device includes two or more microphones and noise reduction circuitry including neural network circuitry. The neural network circuitry is configured to: receive multiple audio signals wherein at least two of the multiple audio signals each originate from a different one of the two or more microphones and/or at least one of the multiple audio signals is a beamformed audio signal originating from the two or more microphones; and implement one or more neural network layers trained to perform background noise modification and spatial focusing based on the multiple audio signals, such that the neural network circuitry generates, based on the multiple audio signals, one or more neural network outputs. The noise reduction circuitry is configured to output, based on the one or more neural network outputs, an output audio signal comprising a background noise-modified and spatially-focused version of a first audio signal of the multiple audio signals.