Early Stopping in Multi-Track ML Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning model development is limited by the need for sophisticated software development expertise and is not easily accessible for remote use of cloud-based computing resources, particularly for efficient training, adaptation, and deployment of models across various domains.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning implementation application programming interface (MLI API) is provided for remote-access clients, enabling users to access cloud-based resources for training, adapting, and optimizing machine learning models through a workflow engine that orchestrates commands, schedules jobs, and manages dependencies, facilitating efficient deployment and inference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Power

If machine learning model training is performed using traditional local computing resources, then users can maintain data privacy and control, but computing power and training efficiency are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing powerVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a cloud-based machine learning platform as an intermediary between users and computing resources. Users can train models locally with minimal code while the cloud platform provides the heavy computational power through distributed training infrastructure, resolving the contradiction between limited local computing power and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The training process is segmented into local components (model definition, data preparation) and cloud components (distributed computation, hyperparameter tuning). This segmentation allows users to benefit from cloud computing power without managing the complexity of distributed training systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If sophisticated software development expertise is required for machine learning model training, then training can be performed with full control, but accessibility and ease of use are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of useVSAvoidsoftware complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent provides pre-built training templates and code snippets that users can copy and modify. Instead of requiring users to develop training pipelines from scratch, they can replicate proven training configurations for their own models, significantly reducing the software development expertise needed while maintaining full control over the training process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automated hyperparameter tuning and experiment management that performs sophisticated software functions automatically. Users simply specify their training goals and the system self-manages the complex software orchestration, making advanced machine learning accessible to users without extensive software development background.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If multiple hyperparameter combinations are tested through exhaustive experimentation, then optimal model performance can be achieved, but training time and computational resources are significantly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performanceVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements early stopping mechanisms that perform partial experimentation by terminating training when performance plateaus are detected. Instead of exhaustively testing all possible hyperparameter combinations, the system performs sufficient experimentation to achieve near-optimal performance while avoiding wasteful continuation of unpromising training runs, significantly reducing training time while maintaining model quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors training progress and provides feedback on hyperparameter performance. Based on this feedback, it dynamically adjusts the experimentation strategy, focusing computational resources on promising hyperparameter combinations and abandoning underperforming ones, thereby achieving optimal model performance with reduced training time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Adaptability or versatility

If cloud-based resources are made accessible for remote machine learning training, then accessibility and collaboration are improved, but resource management and orchestration complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccessibilityVSAvoidorchestration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal cloud platform that handles multiple functions through a unified interface: resource allocation, experiment orchestration, model training, and result management. This universal system allows users to access cloud-based machine learning resources remotely without needing to understand or manage the underlying orchestration complexity, achieving both accessibility and simplified user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230342666A1Multi-track machine learning model training using early termination in cloud-supported platforms
Publication Date: 2023.10.26 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20230342666A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342666A1 patent drawing
  • US20230342666A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices, systems, and techniques for experiment-based training of machine learning models (MLMs) using early stopping. The techniques include starting training tracks (TTs) that train candidate MLMs using the same training data and respective sets of training settings, performing a first evaluation of a first candidate MLM prior to completion of a corresponding first TT, and responsive to the first evaluation, placing the first TT on an inactive status, inactive status indicating that further training of the first candidate MLM is to be ceased. The techniques further include continuing at least a second TT using the training data, and responsive to conclusion of the TTs, selecting, as one or more final MLMs, the first candidate MLM or a second candidate MLM.