Earth Working Machine Parameter Control for Tool Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The continuous wear of earth working tools in road reconstruction and mining processes leads to inefficient operations, high maintenance costs, and frequent tool replacements due to subjective machine parameter settings that do not adequately consider wear rates, especially when dealing with varying material properties.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a method to optimize machine parameters based on sensed material properties, allowing for the minimization of tool wear by adjusting parameters such as milling depth, rotation speed, and engine output, thereby extending maintenance intervals and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machine parameters are set to maximize working output, then productivity is improved, but wear on earth working tools increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking outputVSAvoidwear on tools
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts machine parameters (rotation speed, advance rate, milling depth) based on real-time material property sensing and wear state monitoring. By changing operational parameters according to actual conditions, the system optimizes the balance between productivity and wear, preventing excessive wear while maintaining efficient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention implements a closed-loop feedback system where wear state is continuously monitored and fed back to adjust machine parameters. The control unit receives wear information from sensors and automatically modifies operational parameters to prevent excessive wear, creating a self-regulating system that balances output and tool life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Duration of action of moving object

If machine parameters are set to minimize wear, then tool life is extended, but working output decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool lifeVSAvoidworking output
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static, subjective parameter setting to dynamic, objective parameter adjustment. Machine parameters are continuously adapted based on real-time sensing of material properties and wear state, allowing the system to optimize tool life without permanently sacrificing productivity. The dynamics enable flexible response to changing conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By dynamically changing operational parameters based on actual wear state and material properties, the system prevents premature tool failure while maintaining high productivity during periods when tools are still effective. This eliminates the need to consistently operate at reduced parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If frequent inspections of wear state are conducted, then tool replacement timing is optimized, but machine availability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool replacement timingVSAvoidmachine availability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated self-monitoring of wear state through integrated sensors and processing units. The machine performs its own wear assessment without requiring external inspection, eliminating the need for manual checks that cause downtime. The automated system continuously tracks wear and triggers replacement only when necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual visual inspection is replaced by automated sensing systems (optical, acoustic, or electrical sensors) that continuously monitor wear state. This substitution eliminates the need for machine stoppage during inspection, as the sensing system operates during normal machine function, thereby maintaining availability while improving reliability of wear assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If manual setting of machine parameters is used, then operation simplicity is maintained, but wear optimization is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter setting simplicityVSAvoidwear on tools
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic parameter optimization without requiring expert knowledge from the operator. The processing unit autonomously analyzes sensor data and determines optimal parameters, freeing the operator from complex decision-making while achieving superior wear optimization compared to manual setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically adjusts multiple machine parameters based on sensed material properties and wear state, achieving optimization that would be difficult or impossible through manual setting. The automated parameter changes respond dynamically to conditions without requiring operator intervention or expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11401808B2Earth working machine and method for wear-optimized operation of an earth working machine
Publication Date: 2022.08.02 WIRTGEN GMBH
  • US11401808B2 patent drawing
  • US11401808B2 patent drawing
  • US11401808B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to an earth working machine and to a method for wear-optimized operation of such an earth working machine. Provision is made in this context that machine parameters with which the earth working machine is operated are adapted, in consideration of material properties of the substrate to be worked, in such a way that favorable wear behavior exists for the earth working tools being used.