E-Bike Drive Unit Freewheel Control to Prevent Motor Drag

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing bidirectional freewheels in electric bicycles are inefficient in reliably transitioning between locked and unlocked states, particularly when the motor is undesirably dragged by the rotation of the chainring, leading to mechanical design limitations and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a drive unit with a bidirectional freewheel that involves determining a non-output state and actuating the motor in reverse to open the freewheel, ensuring a reliable and flexible transition between locked and unlocked states without additional mechanical components, using software-based control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a bidirectional freewheel is used to allow motor disconnection during regenerative braking, then the motor can be protected from unwanted rotation, but the freewheel mechanism becomes complex and difficult to control reliably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of freewheel state transitionVSAvoidcomplexity of freewheel mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical actuation system with an electrical control system. The motor itself is used to actuate the freewheel mechanism through controlled rotation in reverse direction, eliminating the need for separate mechanical actuators, springs, and cam mechanisms. This substitution of mechanical systems with electrical control reduces mechanical complexity while improving reliability through software-based state management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The motor serves dual functions: it acts as both the power source for propulsion and the actuator for opening/closing the freewheel mechanism. By using the motor's own rotational capability in reverse to open the freewheel, the system eliminates the need for dedicated actuation components, thereby reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliable state transitions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If additional mechanical components are added to ensure reliable freewheel opening, then the freewheel can be opened reliably, but the device complexity and number of parts increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of freewheel openingVSAvoidnumber of mechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The motor is designed to perform multiple functions: it provides propulsion during normal operation and simultaneously serves as the actuator for freewheel mechanism control. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate actuators, buttons, or mechanical release mechanisms, thereby reducing the number of components while ensuring reliable freewheel opening through the motor's controlled reverse rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Traditional mechanical release mechanisms (such as buttons, levers, or spring-loaded actuators) are replaced by an electrical control system that commands the motor to rotate in reverse. This substitution reduces the number of mechanical parts while maintaining or improving the reliability of freewheel opening through precise electronic control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the motor is continuously actuated to keep the freewheel open, then the freewheel remains reliably open, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefreewheel state stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption of motor
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous motor actuation, the system uses periodic or transient motor activation only when state transitions are required. The motor is actuated in reverse direction temporarily to open the freewheel, or activated briefly to close it, and then remains idle during stable states. This periodic action significantly reduces energy consumption while maintaining reliable freewheel state control throughout operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit monitors the operational state of the drive system (such as rotation direction, torque requirements, and gear position) and uses this feedback information to determine when freewheel state changes are necessary. By activating the motor only when feedback indicates a state transition is needed, the system avoids unnecessary energy consumption while ensuring the freewheel is in the correct state for current operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250353572A1Method for Operating a Drive Unit of an Electric Bicycle
Publication Date: 2025.11.20 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20250353572A1 patent drawing
  • US20250353572A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for operating a drive unit of an electric bicycle is disclosed. The drive unit includes a motor and an output element and a bidirectional freewheel between the motor and the output element. The method includes (i) determining a non-output state in which the output element is in a state of being substantially free of output torque, and (ii) controlling actuation of the motor during the non-output state for opening the bidirectional freewheel into a freewheel state.