E-bike Pedal Control System for Redundant Input and Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing e-bikes require manual operation of the dashboard and control handle for controlling functions, which can lead to safety issues, increased costs due to complex assembly, and malfunction risks when these components fail.

Innovation Solution

A control system that uses pedaling actions as input commands to control e-bike functions, integrating sensors and a driver unit to manage locking and unlocking modes, allowing for redundant input when the dashboard and control handle are malfunctioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If dashboard and control handle are equipped for manual operation, then e-bike control functionality is improved, but device complexity and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control operationVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the control function from the traditional dashboard and control handle, and relocates it to the pedal itself. By integrating the sensor and control unit directly into the pedal assembly, the patent eliminates the need for separate dashboard and control handle components, thereby reducing device complexity and assembly complexity while maintaining control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The pedal is transformed from a single-function component (propulsion) to a multi-functional component that also serves as the control interface. The pedal integrates both the propulsion function and the control function (mode switching, acceleration control) within a single component, eliminating the need for separate control devices and simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If dashboard and control handle are equipped for manual operation, then e-bike control functionality is improved, but production cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual control operationVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the dashboard and control handle components entirely, extracting their control functions and integrating them into the pedal assembly. This elimination of redundant components directly reduces material costs and assembly costs, thereby lowering the overall production cost while maintaining full control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

By making the pedal multi-functional (both propulsion and control), the patent eliminates the need for separate control components, reducing the total number of parts that need to be manufactured and assembled. This consolidation directly reduces production costs while preserving operational capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If dashboard and control handle are used for control, then e-bike functionality is improved, but rider safety deteriorates due to manual operation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidrider safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service control where the pedal itself performs the control function without requiring separate manual operation of dashboard or control handle. The sensor detects pedal actions and automatically triggers appropriate control responses, allowing the rider to control the e-bike through natural pedaling motions without diverting attention to separate control interfaces, thereby enhancing safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The pedal serves as both the propulsion device and the control interface, allowing riders to perform control operations through their natural pedaling actions. This integration eliminates the need for separate control handle operations, enabling riders to maintain focus on the road while controlling the e-bike through pedal movements, thus improving rider safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Device complexity

If only single input source (dashboard) is provided, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates when component malfunctions occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinput source quantityVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements redundancy in advance by integrating the control function directly into the pedal assembly, creating a backup control path. If the traditional dashboard or control handle malfunctions, the rider can still control the e-bike through the pedal-based control system, thereby cushioning against the impact of component failures and improving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The pedal is designed to serve multiple functions (propulsion and control), creating a redundant control pathway. This multi-functionality ensures that if one control system (dashboard/control handle) fails, the other (pedal-based control) can take over, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240400156A1Control system and control method for e-bike
Publication Date: 2024.12.05 DELTA ELECTRONICS INC(CN)
  • US20240400156A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400156A1 patent drawing
  • US20240400156A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for e-bike including a sensor and a driver is disclosed. The sensor senses a pedal of the bike being pedaled to generate a sensing signal. The driver continuously identifies whether the sensing signal matches with an unlocking condition during a first time-duration and whether the sensing signal matches with a mode-determination condition during a second time-duration. The driver controls the e-bike to enter a normal operation mode where a motor of the e-bike is unlocked when the sensing signal matches the unlocking condition, controls the e-bike to enter a standby mode when the sensing signal matches the mode-determination condition under the normal operation mode, or controls the e-bike to return to the normal operation mode when the sensing signal matches the mode-determination condition again under the standby mode.