Electric Bicycle Wheel Hub Assembly with Integrated Motor and Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric bicycle wheel assemblies require complex integration of electric power with the sprocket and chain assembly, necessitating disassembly and increasing production costs and discomfort during physical exertion, while also lacking integrated storage and user-friendly control options.

Innovation Solution

A simplified wheel assembly with an alignment arm for orientation, integrated sensors for data collection and control, and various user interface options, including thumb and foot throttle mechanisms, and electronic device control, allowing for efficient power application and storage of personal items within the wheel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If electric power is integrated with the sprocket and chain assembly, then the bicycle can achieve electric assistance, but the structure becomes complex and requires disassembly for maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric assistance capabilityVSAvoidsprocket and chain assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention separates the electric motor from the traditional sprocket-chain drive system. The motor is integrated into the wheel hub, creating an independent drive unit that eliminates the need for complex integration with the chain assembly. This segmentation allows the electric power system to function independently without complicating the existing bicycle drivetrain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The electric motor is extracted from the sprocket-chain assembly and placed in the wheel hub. This extraction removes the complexity of integrating electric power with the chain system while preserving the simplicity of the traditional bicycle drivetrain for non-electric operation or maintenance scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional electric bicycle power systems are used, then electric assistance is provided, but production costs increase due to complex integration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectric assistance capabilityVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the electric drive system into a separate wheel hub module, the invention simplifies manufacturing. Each component (motor, battery, controller, wheel) can be manufactured and tested independently, then assembled together. This modular approach reduces production complexity and cost compared to integrating the motor directly into the sprocket-chain system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel hub assembly serves multiple functions: it acts as both the wheel structure and the motor housing, while also providing mounting points for the battery and controller. This multi-functionality reduces the total number of components and assembly steps, thereby lowering production costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the wheel assembly is simplified, then production costs are reduced and failure points are minimized, but integrated storage and control features may be limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewheel assembly simplicityVSAvoidintegrated storage and control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a nested arrangement where the battery and control electronics are housed within the wheel hub structure. The storage compartment is integrated into the hub assembly, allowing personal items to be stored within the wheel itself. This nesting maintains the external simplicity of the wheel while providing complex internal functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel hub is designed as a multi-functional platform that simultaneously houses the motor, battery, controller, and storage compartment. This universal design allows the wheel to provide propulsion, power storage, electronic control, and item storage without increasing external complexity or adding separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If multiple control interfaces are added, then user comfort and versatility are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface versatilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller acts as an intermediary that receives signals from multiple input sources (thumb throttle, twist throttle, foot throttle, electronic devices) and processes them into unified motor control commands. This intermediary approach allows multiple user interfaces to coexist without requiring complex integration logic in each individual interface, as the controller centralizes the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11220173B2Powered wheel assemblies and control systems
Publication Date: 2022.01.11 GEOORBITAL
  • US11220173B2 patent drawing
  • US11220173B2 patent drawing
  • US11220173B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Powered wheel assemblies and methods of manufacturing and operating such assemblies are provided.