EBM Process Calibration and Feedback for Certified Part Quality
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current EBM systems lack effective methods for validating and certifying the functionality of their processes, leading to production deviations, high waste rates, increased costs, and quality control challenges, especially in critical fields like medicine and aerospace.
Innovation Solution
A method involving initial calibration of all apparatus components, followed by quality control of products to detect deviations and apply corrective measures by adjusting specific parameters, such as electrons beam energy, to ensure consistent and compliant product quality.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If EBM systems operate without effective validation and certification methods, then production flexibility is maintained, but production deviations occur and product quality becomes inconsistent
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements initial calibration of all apparatus components before production to establish baseline parameters. This preliminary action ensures that the EBM system starts with verified component functionality, preventing production deviations before they occur while maintaining manageable system complexity through structured pre-production preparation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent employs quality control steps that detect deviations in process parameters and provide feedback for corrective measures. This feedback mechanism adjusts parameters such as electron beam energy to maintain consistent product quality, creating a closed-loop system that improves reliability without requiring overly complex validation infrastructure.
2Reliability
If comprehensive quality control steps are implemented, then product quality consistency improves, but production time increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent implements self-check procedures where the EBM system automatically monitors its own process parameters and detects deviations. This self-service approach to quality control reduces the need for external inspection steps, maintaining product quality consistency while minimizing additional production time requirements.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent replaces extensive manual quality control procedures with automated detection systems that monitor process parameters in real-time. This substitution of mechanical/manual inspection with automated sensing and feedback mechanisms improves quality consistency without significantly increasing production time, as the monitoring occurs concurrently with manufacturing.
3Stability of the object's composition
If frequent calibration and validation procedures are performed, then process stability is ensured, but production costs increase
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs comprehensive calibration of all components during an initial setup phase before production begins. This preliminary calibration establishes stable process parameters without requiring frequent repeated calibrations during production, ensuring process stability while minimizing the recurring costs and time associated with repeated validation procedures.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements continuous monitoring of process parameters with automated feedback that detects deviations and triggers corrective measures only when necessary. This feedback-driven approach maintains process stability by intervening only when actual deviations occur, rather than through frequent predetermined calibration cycles, thereby reducing unnecessary production costs while ensuring stability.
4Manufacturing precision
If multiple process parameters are monitored and adjusted, then manufacturing precision improves, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
The patent focuses monitoring and adjustment efforts on critical process parameters that have the greatest impact on manufacturing precision, such as electron beam energy and process temperature. By identifying and controlling only the most influential parameters rather than all possible parameters, the system achieves high dimensional accuracy while avoiding the complexity of managing exhaustive parameter sets.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements targeted feedback control that monitors specific critical parameters and automatically adjusts them when deviations are detected. This selective feedback approach maintains manufacturing precision for key dimensions without requiring complex control systems that manage all possible parameters, thereby achieving high accuracy with manageable device complexity.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This approach significantly improves productivity by reducing non-compliant products, lowering costs, and ensuring process stability and certification according to industry standards, enhancing the reliability of EBM technology.
Implementation Method 1
a focused electrons beam... This technology uses this electrons beam for sintering a predetermined amount of powder
Implementation Method 2
the current of the filament, which quantifies the kinetic energy of the emitted electrons and the consequent power/ speed of the electrons beam
Implementation Method 3
it is necessary that the electrons beam is generated in conditions of absolute vacuum, in order to avoid phenomena of interaction of the electrons with molecules of the atmosphere
Implementation Method 4
temperature of the platform or working plate (called start plate), measured constantly to check that the fusion temperature of the powders is constant
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
AI summary
The invention relates to a method for regulating the operation of an electromechanical apparatus (1), for example an EBM apparatus, in order to obtain certified processed products, wherein it is provided an initial calibration step that is intended to check the proper functioning of all the component parts of the apparatus (1) structured to ensure the complete functionality and a subsequent quality control step carried out on the obtained products by the carried out working process. The method entails the following steps: -defining a plurality of measurement parameters relating to the component parts of the apparatus; -measuring at least some of said parameters by means of sensors and/or measurement indicators related to said parameters during at least one processing phase performed by the apparatus; -performing a quality control step on the obtained products after the working process obtaining data on any deviation from the expected quality; -comparing the detected measurements of said parameters and data on any deviation from the expected quality with corresponding values of reference parameters available for that specific apparatus and for those products; -detecting any deviations in one or more of said parameters or said data with respect to the values of the reference parameters; -computing, on the basis of such differences, a total correction and regulation value; -applying said total correction and regulation value preferably to only one of said parameters prior to the subsequent process, for example to the generation energy of the electrons beam (3). Basically, the method of the present invention allows obtaining semi-finished products free from structural defects by means of a primary check of the correct functioning of the various component parts of the apparatus (calibration procedure), a secondary check of the operational effectiveness of the process itself (operational qualification procedure) and a further final check of the process stability and repeatability within a process window (performance qualification).