Eccentric Dilator System for Directional Spinal Tissue Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current surgical dilator systems are inadequate for providing preferential directional dilation in anatomical rostral and caudal directions while minimizing dilation in the anatomical posterior direction, and existing retractors lack independent movement of blades, leading to tissue disruption and poor control during spinal surgery.

Innovation Solution

A dilator system comprising a series of dilators with eccentric channels and gaps to minimize posterior dilation, combined with a retractor system allowing independent movement of blades for enhanced control and tissue access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If concentric symmetrically shaped dilators are used, then minimal trauma to tissue is achieved, but preferential directional dilation cannot be provided

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue traumaVSAvoiddirectional dilation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs asymmetric dilator geometries including oblong-shaped dilators with varying cross-sectional dimensions and eccentric channels that are offset from the longitudinal axis. This asymmetry enables preferential dilation in specific directions (anterior, lateral, posterior) while maintaining controlled minimal trauma through the elongated shape that distributes force more evenly compared to traditional round dilators

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Adaptability or versatility

If off-center lumens are used in round-walled dilators, then some directional dilation is provided, but the system becomes unbalanced and difficult to control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional dilationVSAvoidcontrol and rotation
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using off-center lumens in round walls, the patent employs oblong-shaped dilators with eccentric channels where the channel is intentionally offset toward the posterior aspect. The oblong geometry provides inherent balance and stability while the eccentric channel placement achieves directional dilation without compromising rotational control or balance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different geometric properties to different parts of the dilator system. The outer wall geometry is oblong for stability and control, while the inner channel is eccentric for directional dilation. This local differentiation of geometric qualities allows the system to achieve both ease of operation and directional capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If oblong-shaped dilators are used, then some relative directional dilation is achieved, but tissue disruption occurs in all directions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirectional dilationVSAvoidtissue disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a series of oblong dilators with progressively different cross-sectional dimensions and eccentric channel placements. Each dilator in the sequence is designed to dilate tissue preferentially in specific directions (anterior, lateral, posterior) while minimizing disruption in other directions, achieving localized controlled dilation rather than uniform disruption in all directions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If traditional retractors are used, then tissue access is provided, but blades cannot move independently leading to poor control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetissue accessVSAvoidblade movement control
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retractor system is divided into multiple independent movable blades that can be adjusted separately. Each blade is mounted on the retractor frame in a way that allows independent movement and positioning, enabling precise control of tissue access and retraction without requiring complex coordinated movement of all blades simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9028522B1Tissue dilator and retractor system and method of use
Publication Date: 2015.05.12 SEASPINE ORTHOPEDICS CORP
  • US9028522B1 patent drawing
  • US9028522B1 patent drawing
  • US9028522B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is an apparatus and a method for surgical dilation and retraction of tissues during a medical procedure, for example a spinal surgery. The apparatus includes a dilator assembly that includes a plurality of slidingly engaging dilators, wherein at least one dilator includes an outer wall shape different from its inner wall shape. At least one of the dilators may include an eccentrically positioned circular channel, a generally oblong outer wall shape, and a longitudinal gap in a wall. The dilator system may be used in a method that provides off center differential dilation of tissues in one or more preferred directions. A retractor system that may be used with the dilator system is also disclosed.