Eccentric Jaw Crusher Mounting Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Jaw crushers face challenges in optimizing capacity without compromising other physical and operational characteristics, such as increasing the throw of the movable jaw while maintaining acceptable power-draw and reducing noise emission.

Innovation Solution

A crushing jaw mounting assembly with an eccentrically mounted shaft and bearings, where the central axis of the jaw bearing is offset from the frame bearing by a distance of 20 mm to 35 mm, providing a desired throw and displacement of the movable jaw, and stabilizing the gyroscopic procession with a larger inner diameter jaw bearing and smaller frame bearing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the throw of the movable jaw is increased to maximize capacity, then the crusher throughput is improved, but the power-draw increases and noise emission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrusher capacityVSAvoidpower-draw
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the geometric parameters of the mounting assembly, specifically the eccentricity distance between the jaw bearing and frame bearing axes, to optimize the throw characteristics. This allows capacity maximization with controlled power-draw by adjusting the eccentric offset rather than simply increasing overall jaw throw

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces asymmetric positioning of the jaw bearing relative to the frame bearing, with the jaw bearing offset by 20-35mm from the frame bearing axis. This asymmetric configuration creates optimized throw characteristics that improve capacity while controlling power requirements through the specific geometric relationship

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Productivity

If the throw of the movable jaw is increased to maximize capacity, then the crusher throughput is improved, but noise emission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrusher capacityVSAvoidnoise emission
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By optimizing the eccentricity parameters (20-35mm offset) and bearing dimensions, the invention achieves capacity maximization with reduced operational speed requirements, thereby reducing noise emission from the moving components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If the jaw bearing inner diameter is increased to stabilize gyroscopic procession, then the mounting stability is improved, but the overall weight of the crusher increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegyroscopic stabilityVSAvoidcrusher weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality optimization by specifying that the jaw bearing inner diameter be greater than the frame bearing inner diameter (by at least twice the offset distance, 40-80mm difference). This localized dimensional difference stabilizes the gyroscopic procession without requiring a proportional increase in overall crusher weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the dimensional parameters of the bearings, specifically setting the jaw bearing inner diameter larger than the frame bearing inner diameter by a specific amount (40-80mm). This parameter optimization achieves gyroscopic stability while controlling overall weight through precise dimensional design rather than uniform scaling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration maximizes crusher capacity, reduces operational speed for lower noise emission, and avoids damaging forces, while maintaining a stable and lightweight design compatible with existing mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a central axis of the eccentrically mounted jaw bearing is offset from a central axis of the frame bearing by a distance in the range 20 mm to 35 mm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEccentric mounting: Eccentric

Data Source

PatentEP3313575A1Eccentric crushing jaw mounting assembly
Publication Date: 2018.05.02 SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB

AI summary

A mounting assembly to mount a jaw at a jaw crusher. The assembly comprises a rotatable shaft having a jaw bearing mount region that is eccentric relative to a longitudinal axis of the shaft such that a central axis of a jaw bearing that mounts the jaw at the crusher is off-set from a central axis of a frame bearing that mounts the shaft at the crusher by a distance in the range 20 mm to 35 mm.