Eccentric Lobe Reamer Reduces Wellbore Drag and Whirl

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional reaming techniques for wellbores result in increased friction, torque, and drag during drilling, leading to limited wellbore extension and difficulties in passing production strings, while also failing to straighten the well path and are prone to whirl, causing radial impact damage to drill bit cutters.

Innovation Solution

A reamer with an eccentric lobe and roller design that primarily cuts away material near the center of the wellbore's drift, reducing applied power and drag, and limiting whirl by providing an opposing force to the lobe, thereby improving the well path and reducing radial forces on the drill bit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If conventional reaming techniques are used to enlarge the wellbore diameter, then the drift diameter is increased, but friction, torque, and drag during drilling increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore diameterVSAvoidfriction and drag
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The reamer is designed with an eccentric lobe configuration where cutting elements are positioned only on one side of the reamer body, creating asymmetric material removal. This local quality approach enlarges the wellbore diameter in the specific area needing expansion while minimizing contact and friction on the opposite side, thereby reducing overall drag and energy loss during drilling operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The reamer employs an asymmetric geometry with an eccentric lobe that creates an uneven distribution of cutting elements around the reamer circumference. This asymmetry allows the reamer to enlarge the wellbore diameter effectively while maintaining reduced engagement with the wellbore wall during rotation, thus lowering friction and drag compared to conventional symmetric reamers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Area of stationary object

If conventional reaming is performed after drilling to enlarge the wellbore, then the drift diameter increases, but additional time and expense are added to well completion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrift diameterVSAvoidwell completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reamer is integrated directly into the drilling assembly, allowing reaming operations to be performed simultaneously with or immediately following drilling in a single continuous operation. This merging of drilling and reaming functions eliminates the need for separate reaming runs, thereby reducing overall well completion time and operational expenses while achieving the required drift diameter enlargement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The reamer is positioned and activated during the drilling process itself, performing the wellbore enlargement action preliminarily before the drilling operation is fully completed. This preliminary reaming action ensures that the drift diameter is adequately prepared during the initial drilling phase, avoiding the need for subsequent separate reaming operations and reducing total project time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Area of stationary object

If conventional reaming enlarges the entire wellbore diameter, then the drift diameter increases, but the well path is not straightened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewellbore diameterVSAvoidwell path straightness
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The eccentric lobe reamer removes material locally from specific areas of the wellbore wall rather than uniformly enlarging the entire circumference. This localized material removal allows the reamer to simultaneously enlarge the drift diameter and correct well path deviations by preferentially cutting into high spots or curved sections, thereby straightening the well path while expanding the bore

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If rotary tools are used inside the bore, then drilling continues, but whirl occurs causing radial impact damage to cutters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrilling continuityVSAvoidradial impact damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The asymmetric eccentric lobe configuration creates an unbalanced cutting pattern that prevents the reamer from settling into a stable whirl mode. The uneven distribution of cutting elements around the reamer circumference disrupts the radial forces that typically cause whirl, thereby maintaining drilling continuity while reducing radial impact damage to cutters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The design accepts that some radial forces will occur during rotation but converts the potentially harmful whirl effect into a beneficial self-correcting mechanism. The eccentric lobe configuration causes the reamer to naturally oscillate in a controlled manner that prevents sustained whirl while still maintaining effective cutting action, thereby transforming a harmful phenomenon into one that protects the cutters from severe impact damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively increases the drift diameter of the wellbore, reduces whirl, and minimizes radial impact damage, allowing for more efficient drilling with reduced torque and drag, while maintaining continuous engagement of the cutting teeth and preventing the reamer from digging in and transferring whirl forces.

Implementation Method 1

When rotary tools are used inside a bore there is a dynamic effect called 'whirl' that can occur. This is a secondary mode of motion different from the spinning of the tool, but driven by the rotation of the tool.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWhirl:

Implementation Method 2

Large radial forces develop that cause radial impact damage to the tool's cutters.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadial forces:

Implementation Method 3

cutting away material primarily forming surfaces nearer the center of the drift

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMaterial removal:

Implementation Method 4

Repeated correcting of the direction of the drill bit during sliding causes friction between the wellbore and the drill string greater than when the drill string is rotated.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 5

reduces applied power, applied torque and resulting drag compared to conventional reamers

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDrag: Drag

Data Source

PatentEP3695090B1Wellbore reaming systems and devices
Publication Date: 2023.12.06 EXTREME TECH LLC
  • EP3695090B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3695090B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3695090B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The present invention provides a method and apparatus for increasing the drift diameter and improving the well path of the wellbore, accomplished in one embodiment by cutting away material primarily forming surfaces nearer the center of the drift, thereby reducing applied power, applied torque and resulting drag compared to conventional reamers that cut into all surfaces of the wellbore