Multi-Algorithm ECG Analysis System for False Alarm Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electrocardiogram (ECG) data analysis systems face high rates of false positive alarms due to the inability to account for individual patient variations, leading to increased costs and reduced sensitivity in detecting cardiac events.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a system that runs multiple algorithms on ECG data streams, combining their outputs with confidence values and weighting factors to select the most accurate diagnosis, and allowing technician feedback to personalize the algorithm configuration for each patient.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single algorithm is used for ECG data analysis to maintain simplicity, then device complexity is reduced, but false positive alarm rates increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealgorithm complexityVSAvoidalarm accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the ECG analysis task into multiple specialized algorithms, each optimized for detecting specific cardiac conditions or waveform characteristics. Instead of using one general-purpose algorithm, the system segments the analysis into multiple focused algorithms that work together, reducing false positives while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines the results from multiple algorithms through a fusion process that integrates their outputs. By merging the findings of several specialized algorithms and evaluating their confidence levels, the system achieves higher diagnostic accuracy and reduced false alarm rates compared to any single algorithm operating alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Measurement precision

If algorithm sensitivity is increased to detect all cardiac events, then detection capability improves, but false positive results increase excessively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the system continuously evaluates the outputs of multiple algorithms and adjusts their weighting and confidence thresholds based on performance. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain high sensitivity for detecting true cardiac events while dynamically reducing the impact of algorithms that generate false positives, thereby improving overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes parameters such as confidence thresholds and algorithm weighting factors based on the specific patient data and clinical context. By adjusting these parameters, the system optimizes the balance between detection sensitivity and false positive rate, allowing high sensitivity when warranted while suppressing false alarms in appropriate contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple algorithms are run on ECG data to improve diagnostic accuracy, then reliability increases, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the multiple algorithms into modular, independent components that can be developed, tested, and maintained separately. This segmentation reduces system complexity by organizing the computational workload into manageable units while still achieving the diagnostic accuracy benefits of multiple algorithms through their coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If technician review is used to reduce false positives, then alarm accuracy improves, but time consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the system to perform self-service by automatically resolving many false positive cases through the multi-algorithm approach. The system independently evaluates multiple algorithm outputs, compares their confidence levels, and automatically filters out false alarms without requiring technician intervention, thereby maintaining high alarm accuracy while minimizing time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary computational layer that acts as a mediator between raw ECG data and final alarm generation. This intermediary layer processes and reconciles the outputs of multiple algorithms, automatically resolving conflicts and filtering false positives before presenting results to technicians, thereby reducing the time and effort required for manual review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10791952B2Electrocardiogram device and methods
Publication Date: 2020.10.06 VENTRILINK CORP
  • US10791952B2 patent drawing
  • US10791952B2 patent drawing
  • US10791952B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Devices and methods are described that provide improved diagnosis from the processing of physiological data. The methods include use of multiple algorithms and intelligently combing the results of multiple algorithms to provide a single optimized diagnostic result. The algorithms are adaptive and may be customized for particular data sets or for particular patients. Examples are shown with applications to electrocardiogram data, but the methods taught are applicable to many types of physiological data.