ECG Arrhythmia Detection Using Time-Frequency Autoencoder Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining arrhythmia from electrocardiographic information are limited to specific types, such as atrial fibrillation, and struggle with sudden arrhythmias and require prior learning, making them ineffective for various arrhythmias like ventricular tachycardia.

Innovation Solution

An integrated biosignal analysis system using time-frequency conversion, auto-encoders, and difference calculation to determine arrhythmia based on electrocardiographic information, with a learned model trained on 95% normal waveform data, allowing for accurate identification of various arrhythmias.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods focus on RR ratio variations to determine atrial fibrillation, then determination accuracy for atrial fibrillation is improved, but the system cannot detect other types of arrhythmias like ventricular tachycardia

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidarrhythmia type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by designing a determination system that can detect multiple types of arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia, and other abnormalities) through a single integrated analysis framework. The system processes electrocardiographic information to identify various arrhythmia patterns beyond just RR ratio variations, making the determination function universal across different arrhythmia types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes by analyzing multiple electrocardiographic parameters simultaneously rather than relying solely on RR ratio variations. The system examines waveform morphology, interval patterns, and other electrical characteristics to detect different arrhythmia types, adapting the analysis parameters based on the detected arrhythmia category.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the system requires continuous long-term arrhythmia data to determine atrial fibrillation, then determination reliability is improved, but sudden arrhythmias occurring briefly cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination reliabilityVSAvoiddetection time window
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by preparing multiple determination models in advance, each specialized for detecting different types of arrhythmias. The system pre-processes electrocardiographic information to extract relevant features and applies the appropriate determination model based on the detected arrhythmia type, enabling rapid detection without requiring continuous long-term data accumulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamics by adapting the determination approach based on the detected arrhythmia type and duration. When brief arrhythmia events are detected, the system dynamically adjusts the analysis parameters and determination criteria to maintain detection accuracy, rather than requiring fixed long-term continuous data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If machine learning models are trained on specific arrhythmia data, then determination accuracy for learned arrhythmias is improved, but the system cannot determine unlearned or rare arrhythmia types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracyVSAvoidarrhythmia type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies universality by creating a determination system that handles both common and rare arrhythmia types through a unified multi-model framework. The system incorporates multiple determination models trained on different arrhythmia types and selects the appropriate model based on the detected pattern, enabling accurate detection of both learned and previously rare arrhythmias without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If physicians visually examine long-term continuous electrocardiographic information, then comprehensive arrhythmia detection is improved, but the burden on physicians increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection comprehensivenessVSAvoidphysician workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by implementing an automated determination system that independently analyzes electrocardiographic information and identifies arrhythmias without requiring physician visual examination. The system performs self-determination using pre-trained models and algorithms, automatically generating diagnosis results and significantly reducing or eliminating the need for manual physician review of long-term continuous data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12484832B2Biosignal analysis system
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 TORAY INDUSTRIES INC
  • US12484832B2 patent drawing
  • US12484832B2 patent drawing
  • US12484832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is an integrated biosignal analysis system performing determination of arrhythmia based on electrocardiographic information. The biosignal analysis system includes: an input unit configured to receive input of the electrocardiographic information; a data conversion unit configured to perform time-frequency conversion on the electrocardiographic information to generate data for determination; a data restoration unit configured to restore the data for determination using a learned model including a auto-encoder to generate restored data; a difference calculation unit configured to calculate a difference amount between the restored data and the data for determination; and a determination unit configured to determine whether the data for determination is either of normal waveform data and arrhythmic waveform data based on the difference amount.