ECG Signal Quality Assessment via Wavelet Wiener Filter

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating ECG signal quality are inadequate, particularly in wearable devices with limited processing power, as they fail to effectively distinguish between high-quality and low-quality signals, leading to unnecessary resource usage and potential diagnostic inaccuracies due to noise and artifacts in long-term monitoring data.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that estimate ECG signal quality using a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) metric, calculated through a Wavelet Wiener Filter, allowing for real-time processing and segmentation of signals into different quality classes to optimize analysis and reduce computational demands.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If all ECG signals are processed without quality discrimination, then comprehensive analysis is performed, but computing resources are wasted unnecessarily

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalysis throughputVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary quality assessment to ECG signals before full analysis. A quality metric is calculated for each signal segment to determine its suitability for further processing. This preliminary action filters out low-quality signals that would waste computational resources, allowing the system to focus processing power only on signals likely to yield meaningful diagnostic information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If signal quality assessment is performed, then processing efficiency is improved, but additional computational steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing pipeline complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter being measured by introducing a quality metric that quantifies signal characteristics such as amplitude, frequency content, and noise levels. This parameter change enables automatic differentiation of signal quality without requiring complex manual evaluation, improving processing efficiency while adding only one computational step to the pipeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If low-quality signals are analyzed, then no data is lost, but diagnostic accuracy suffers due to noise and artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidpotential diagnostic data loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality assessment to different segments of the ECG signal independently. Each segment is evaluated for its quality metric, and only segments meeting a quality threshold are selected for further diagnostic analysis. This local approach ensures that high-quality segments are utilized for accurate diagnosis while avoiding the contamination of low-quality noisy segments, thereby maintaining diagnostic reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12102450B2System and method for assessing physiological signal quality
Publication Date: 2024.10.01 MAYO FOUNDATION FOR MEDICAL EDUCATION & RESEARCH
  • US12102450B2 patent drawing
  • US12102450B2 patent drawing
  • US12102450B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for evaluating physiological signal quality. A physiological signal, based on a series measurements on a subject, may be received. A quality of the physiological signal received may be evaluated, and an analysis of the physiological signal may be based at least in part on the quality evaluation.