Acoustic Echo Cancellation with Selective Post-Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing acoustic echo cancellation devices fail to effectively suppress echoes in hands-free mode, especially in double-talk situations where far-end speech and near-end speech or music signals are simultaneously present, leading to signal distortions due to the loudness of far-end signals.

Innovation Solution

An acoustic echo cancellation device that combines multiple input signals into an aggregate signal, uses adaptive filters to produce echo cancellation signals, and employs a post-processor to selectively suppress echo components, prioritizing suppression of echo components from one input signal over another, thereby minimizing distortion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a post-processor is used to suppress remaining echo components in the residual signal, then echo suppression is improved, but near-end signal distortion increases in double-talk situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveecho suppressionVSAvoidnear-end signal distortion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the echo cancellation process into multiple independent adaptive filters, each processing a specific input signal (far-end speech, music, etc.) separately. The post-processor then receives multiple echo cancellation signals corresponding to different input sources, allowing selective suppression of echo components from dominant signals while preserving near-end speech, thus resolving the contradiction between echo suppression and signal distortion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the loudspeaker and microphone are positioned close together for hands-free mode, then ease of operation is improved, but echo cancellation performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehands-free mode usabilityVSAvoidecho cancellation performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-functional adaptive filter system that can process multiple types of input signals (far-end speech, music, etc.) simultaneously through separate adaptive filters. This universal approach allows the system to maintain effective echo cancellation performance regardless of the specific signal sources, enabling reliable hands-free operation even when the loudspeaker and microphone are positioned close together.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple input signals (far-end speech and music) are processed simultaneously, then adaptability is improved, but echo cancellation accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-signal processing capabilityVSAvoidecho cancellation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the echo cancellation process into separate adaptive filters for different input signals (far-end speech, music, etc.), with each filter independently modeling its specific acoustic path. This segmentation maintains high echo cancellation accuracy for each signal type while preserving the system's ability to handle multiple simultaneous inputs, thus resolving the contradiction between adaptability and accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8155302B2Acoustic echo canceller
Publication Date: 2012.04.10 MEDIATEK INC
  • US8155302B2 patent drawing
  • US8155302B2 patent drawing
  • US8155302B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An acoustic echo cancellation device for canceling an echo in a microphone signal in response to first and second input signals includes a first combination unit for combining the first and second input signals into an aggregate input signal. The device further includes an adaptive filter unit for filtering the aggregate input signal so as to produce an aggregate echo cancellation signal. A second combination unit combines the aggregate echo cancellation signal with the microphone signal so as to produce a residual signal, and an additional filter unit filters either the first or second input signal so as to produce a first or a second partial echo cancellation signal. A post-processor unit suppresses remaining echo components in the residual signal. The post-processor unit uses at least one partial echo cancellation signal to suppress echo components corresponding with the first input signal to a greater extent than echo components corresponding with the second input signal.