Echo Signal Suppression in Distance Measuring Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing distance measuring devices with the transmitter and receiver in the same optical path suffer from direct optical crosstalk, leading to interference at short measurement distances, limiting the range to around 100 meters due to a 'blind' window that prevents measurement during crosstalk, and existing solutions either disable measurement or require complex signal inversion.

Innovation Solution

The method involves subtracting the signal generated by the receiver from a counter-signal to reduce or eliminate interference, using a microprocessor to analyze and adjust the signal to compensate for crosstalk, allowing measurements at short distances by regulating the signal to achieve a desired level free from reflections and scattered light.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the transmitter and receiver are arranged in the same optical path, then the device structure is simplified, but optical crosstalk occurs causing interference at short measurement distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice structureVSAvoidoptical crosstalk
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by generating a counter-signal that anticipates and cancels the optical crosstalk before it interferes with the measurement. The system predicts the crosstalk signal characteristics and subtracts a corresponding counter-signal from the received signal, preventing the harmful effect from corrupting the measurement data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful optical crosstalk into a beneficial signal by measuring its characteristics and using it to generate a counter-signal. The previously harmful crosstalk becomes the basis for creating a cancellation signal that eliminates interference, transforming the problem into a solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a blind window is used to block crosstalk, then optical crosstalk interference is eliminated, but no measurement can be carried out during this window

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical crosstalk interferenceVSAvoidmeasurement time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the received signal characteristics, identifying crosstalk components, and dynamically adjusting the counter-signal subtraction in real-time. This feedback loop allows the system to maintain measurement continuity while actively canceling crosstalk, eliminating the need for blind windows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If signal inversion is used to compensate for crosstalk, then measurement at short distances becomes possible, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshort distance measurement capabilityVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies copying by creating a simplified model or representation of the crosstalk signal and using this copy to generate the counter-signal. Instead of complex real-time analysis, the system uses a copied signal model that can be easily subtracted, reducing processing complexity while maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Object-affected harmful factors

If structural measures like screens are used to reduce crosstalk, then optical crosstalk is minimized, but the device structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical crosstalkVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/structural crosstalk reduction measures with an electronic signal processing solution. Instead of using physical screens or complex optical isolation mechanisms, the system uses electronic counter-signal subtraction to cancel crosstalk, transitioning from mechanical to electronic domain for simpler implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables accurate distance measurements at short ranges without suppressing useful echoes, and compensates for changing crosstalk conditions over time, such as due to dust or thermal influences, by calibrating the counter-pulse to reduce optical crosstalk effectively.

Implementation Method 1

a laser pulse or pulse trains are emitted by a transmitter, reflected by the target object, detected by a receiver

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

detected by a receiver, and based on the time delay between the transmitter and Received pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 3

a laser pulse or pulse trains are emitted by a transmitter

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser emission: Laser

Implementation Method 4

the transmitter and receiver can be arranged at least partially in the same optical path

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight transmission: Light

Data Source

PatentEP2565669B1Method for suppressing an echo signal
Publication Date: 2020.03.25 SWAROVSKI OPTIK KG
  • EP2565669B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The method involves generating a counter signal corresponding to an echo signal and superimposing a signal (I-1) generated by a receiver (2). The signal generated by receiver and the counter signal are superimposed in an additive and subtractive manner. A resultant signal of the signal generated by the receiver and the counter signal is reinforced. A height, an amount, amplitude or a pulse-shaped counter signal is varied in a calibration step. An independent claim is included for a remote optical device with an optical path.