Eco-Routing Controller for Electric Vehicle Range Extension

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional route planning systems for vehicles do not account for energy efficiency, leading to suboptimal routes that may result in insufficient range or increased fuel consumption, especially in electric and hybrid vehicles.

Innovation Solution

Intelligent vehicle systems with real-time eco-routing and adaptive driving control capabilities that use predictive algorithms to optimize energy usage by suggesting driver behavior changes and on-demand charging, extending the driving range and improving fuel economy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional route planning systems are used, then route determination is simple, but energy efficiency is poor and driving range is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of multiple candidate routes before vehicle traversal, calculating energy consumption characteristics in advance using map data, vehicle state, and environmental conditions. This allows the selection of an energy-optimal route before the journey begins, improving energy efficiency without adding complex real-time computation during driving.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual vehicle state, environmental conditions, and energy consumption during traversal, comparing against predicted values. This feedback loop allows dynamic adjustment of route selection and driving parameters to maintain optimal energy efficiency, resolving the contradiction between simple routing and energy optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Duration of action of moving object

If real-time eco-routing and adaptive driving control are implemented, then driving range is extended and fuel economy is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving rangeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The powertrain control module performs multiple functions: traditional engine/motor control, route evaluation, energy consumption prediction, and adaptive driving control. By consolidating these functions into a single controller, the system extends driving range through intelligent control without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the vehicle's existing sensors, processors, and communication systems to perform eco-routing and adaptive control functions. By leveraging already-present components for multiple purposes, the system extends driving range through software intelligence rather than adding extensive new hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Loss of energy

If multiple candidate routes are evaluated for energy characteristics, then energy optimization is improved, but computational time and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidroute planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system evaluates multiple candidate routes but focuses detailed energy analysis only on the most promising options identified by preliminary filtering. This partial evaluation approach achieves sufficient energy optimization without the computational burden of exhaustive analysis of all possible routes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary route filtering and energy characteristic evaluation before final route selection, using map data and vehicle state to pre-assess candidate routes. This preliminary action reduces the computational load during real-time decision-making, balancing energy optimization with acceptable planning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10809733B2Intelligent motor vehicles, systems, and control logic for driver behavior coaching and on-demand mobile charging
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US10809733B2 patent drawing
  • US10809733B2 patent drawing
  • US10809733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Presented are intelligent vehicle systems and control logic for driver coaching and on-demand vehicle charging, methods for making/using such systems, and motor vehicles with real-time eco-routing and automated driving capabilities. A method for controlling operation of a vehicle includes: determining an origin and destination for the vehicle; conducting a geospatial query to identify a candidate route for traversing from the origin to the destination; determining, based on current electrical characteristics of the vehicle's battery pack, an estimated driving range for the vehicle; responsive to the estimated driving range being less than the candidate route's distance, evaluating energy characteristics of the candidate route to derive an estimated energy expenditure to reach the destination; using the estimated energy expenditure, generating an action plan with vehicle maneuvering and/or accessory usage actions that extend the estimated driving range; and commanding a resident vehicle subsystem to execute a control operation based on the action plan.