Self-Adjusting E-Commerce Cost Reconciliation Index

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to accurately and predictably estimate shipping, handling, and delivery costs while maintaining carrier-side cost confidentiality, and do not dynamically adjust for cost distribution in e-commerce transactions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that uses a defined index with classes and tiers to calculate a cumulative contribution amount and delivery value, allowing for electronic reconciliation and dynamic adjustment of baseline ratios to ensure fair cost distribution, using a system comprising servers and modules for instance assignment and reconciliation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a defined index with classes and tiers is used to calculate contribution amounts and delivery values, then measurement precision of cost estimation is improved, but device complexity of the reconciliation system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost estimation accuracyVSAvoidreconciliation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the cost estimation process into multiple hierarchical levels: a defined index with classes (e.g., product categories, delivery zones) and tiers (e.g., weight brackets, value ranges). Each segment contributes to the final cost calculation through predefined baseline ratios, enabling precise cost estimation while maintaining systematic organization that manages complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different baseline ratios to different classes and tiers within the defined index. Instead of using a uniform calculation method, the system tailors the contribution amount and delivery value calculations to specific local conditions (product type, delivery location, item value), improving measurement precision for each segment while keeping the overall system structured.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Adaptability or versatility

If baseline ratios are dynamically adjusted based on reconciliation results, then adaptability of the cost distribution system is improved, but loss of time for system adjustment increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost distribution adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by automatically reconciling cumulative contribution amounts with cumulative delivery values and using the reconciliation results to dynamically adjust baseline ratios. This closed-loop mechanism improves adaptability by continuously optimizing cost distribution based on actual performance data, while the automated nature of the process minimizes manual intervention time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining the structure of the index with classes and tiers, and establishing the framework for dynamic adjustment before actual cost distribution begins. This preparation enables the system to quickly adapt to changing conditions without requiring extensive reconfiguration, reducing the time loss associated with system adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If cumulative contribution amount and cumulative delivery value are electronically reconciled, then reliability of cost distribution is improved, but use of energy for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost distribution reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the calculation and reconciliation processes into a unified electronic system that simultaneously computes cumulative contribution amounts, cumulative delivery values, and their reconciliation. This integration improves reliability by ensuring data consistency across all calculations while reducing the overall energy consumption compared to separate, redundant processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11783281B2System and methods for self-adjusting electronic reconciliation of a contribution amount and delivery value
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICAN INC
  • US11783281B2 patent drawing
  • US11783281B2 patent drawing
  • US11783281B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure are directed to a system, methods, and computer-readable media for a self-regulating and self-adjusting reconciliation of a cumulative contribution amount and a cumulative delivery value determined for instances associated with an entity.