Electronic Control Unit Programming via Mold-Attached Barcode Reader

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and high cost of multipurpose machines for producing thermoplastic containers, along with the risk of human error in programming, are exacerbated by the need for multiple operating parameters and databases that are difficult to update, especially when manufacturing containers for different liquid types or temperatures.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a two-dimensional barcode on each mold that stores compatible operating parameter values, allowing an optical reader to automatically transmit these values to the electronic control unit, limiting parameter choices to compatible settings and eliminating the need for additional databases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a multipurpose machine is used to produce many types of containers, then productivity and versatility are improved, but device complexity and programming difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to produce many types of containersVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The mold carries its own identification data (barcode or RFID tag) that automatically provides the control unit with the necessary forming parameters when the mold is installed. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex manual programming by the operator, as the system automatically retrieves and applies the correct parameters stored with each mold.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The forming parameters are copied and stored on portable data carriers (barcodes or RFID tags) attached to each mold. This allows the parameters to be transferred automatically from the mold's data carrier to the machine's control system, replacing complex database management and manual parameter entry while maintaining versatility across different container types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If predefined recipes are used to limit human error, then reliability is improved, but adaptability and fine-tuning capability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereduction of human errorVSAvoidability to finely adjust parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adapts the forming parameters based on the specific mold installed. Rather than using fixed predefined recipes, the control unit automatically retrieves and applies parameters specific to each mold type, allowing fine-tuned optimization for each container configuration while maintaining reliability through automated parameter selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Each mold carries its own optimized parameters in the form of identification data, enabling the system to automatically select the correct parameters for each mold without relying on predefined recipes. This self-service mechanism ensures both reliability (by preventing human selection errors) and adaptability (by providing mold-specific optimized parameters).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If a complex database is used to store and manage operating parameters, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to manage multiple container typesVSAvoiddatabase complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized database is segmented and distributed to individual molds through portable data carriers (barcodes or RFID tags). Each mold carries its own parameter set locally, eliminating the need for a complex centralized database system while maintaining the ability to manage multiple container types through decentralized parameter storage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The forming parameters are copied from the centralized database to portable data carriers attached to each mold. This copying process simplifies the system architecture by distributing data storage to the point of use, eliminating complex database management requirements while maintaining full adaptability across different container types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Adaptability or versatility

If manual programming is used to select operating parameters, then adaptability is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to select parameters for different containersVSAvoidrisk of human error
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The mold provides its own identification data through barcodes or RFID tags, enabling the control unit to automatically retrieve and apply the correct forming parameters without human intervention. This eliminates human error in parameter selection while maintaining adaptability through mold-specific parameter identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of parameter selection and input is replaced with an automated optical or electromagnetic reading system (barcode scanner or RFID reader). This substitution eliminates human error in parameter selection while maintaining the ability to adapt to different container types through automated parameter retrieval.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11173646B2Method for assisting in the programming of an electronic control unit of a forming station
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 SIDEL PARTICIPATIONS SAS
  • US11173646B2 patent drawing
  • US11173646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for assisting in the programming of an electronic control unit of a forming station comprising molding units, each of which has an interchangeable mold, the method comprising a manual programming step consisting in selecting a value for determined operating parameters through a data entry interface in the electronic control unit, wherein each mold has fastened thereto a storage component having values compatible with each mold for each determined parameter, is attached to said mold, the method comprising a prior step of reading the values stored in the storage component by means of a reader which automatically transmits the values to the electronic control unit to limit the choice of values of each parameter to the compatible values.